From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] fsstress: add mwrite/mread into test operation list
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:59:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322145918.GR21915@dhcp12-143.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322065844.GE14226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:58:44PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:18:02PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > mmap as a popular and basic operation, most of softwares use it to
> > access files. More and more customers report bugs related with
> > mmap/munmap and other stress conditions.
> >
> > So add mmap read/write test into fsstress to increase mmap related
> > stress to reproduce or find more bugs easily.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Nothing changed from V4. Send V5 for fixing xfs/068 failure together.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> >
> > ltp/fsstress.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > src/global.h | 4 ++
> > 2 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/ltp/fsstress.c b/ltp/fsstress.c
> > index 7e7cf60..e341aa1 100644
> > --- a/ltp/fsstress.c
> > +++ b/ltp/fsstress.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ typedef enum {
> > OP_LINK,
> > OP_MKDIR,
> > OP_MKNOD,
> > + OP_MREAD,
> > + OP_MWRITE,
> > OP_PUNCH,
> > OP_ZERO,
> > OP_COLLAPSE,
> > @@ -168,6 +170,8 @@ void getdents_f(int, long);
> > void link_f(int, long);
> > void mkdir_f(int, long);
> > void mknod_f(int, long);
> > +void mread_f(int, long);
> > +void mwrite_f(int, long);
> > void punch_f(int, long);
> > void zero_f(int, long);
> > void collapse_f(int, long);
> > @@ -208,6 +212,8 @@ opdesc_t ops[] = {
> > { OP_LINK, "link", link_f, 1, 1 },
> > { OP_MKDIR, "mkdir", mkdir_f, 2, 1 },
> > { OP_MKNOD, "mknod", mknod_f, 2, 1 },
> > + { OP_MREAD, "mread", mread_f, 4, 0 },
> > + { OP_MWRITE, "mwrite", mwrite_f, 4, 1 },
>
> I don't think mread/mwrite are widely used as read/write, so freq 4
> seems a bit high, freq 2 should be OK.
OK
>
> > { OP_PUNCH, "punch", punch_f, 1, 1 },
> > { OP_ZERO, "zero", zero_f, 1, 1 },
> > { OP_COLLAPSE, "collapse", collapse_f, 1, 1 },
> > @@ -2656,6 +2662,187 @@ mknod_f(int opno, long r)
> > }
> >
> > void
> > +mread_f(int opno, long r)
> > +{
> > + char *addr;
> > + char *buf;
> > + int e;
> > + pathname_t f;
> > + int fd;
> > + size_t len;
> > + __int64_t lr;
> > + off64_t off;
> > + int flags;
> > + struct stat64 stb;
> > + int v;
> > + char st[1024];
> > +
> > + init_pathname(&f);
> > + if (!get_fname(FT_REGFILE, r, &f, NULL, NULL, &v)) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread - no filename\n", procid, opno);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + fd = open_path(&f, O_RDONLY);
> > + e = fd < 0 ? errno : 0;
> > + check_cwd();
> > + if (fd < 0) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread - open %s failed %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, e);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (fstat64(fd, &stb) < 0) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread - fstat64 %s failed %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, errno);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + close(fd);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (stb.st_size == 0) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread - %s%s zero size\n", procid, opno,
> > + f.path, st);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + close(fd);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + inode_info(st, sizeof(st), &stb, v);
> > + lr = ((__int64_t)random() << 32) + random();
> > + off = (off64_t)(lr % stb.st_size);
> > + off &= (off64_t)(~(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) - 1));
> > + len = (size_t)(random() % MIN(stb.st_size - off, FILELEN_MAX)) + 1;
> > +
> > + /* try private file mappings with 20% rate */
> > + flags = (random() % 20) ? MAP_SHARED : MAP_PRIVATE;
>
> This is not 20%, it's 5%. But I think 50%:50% should be OK?
Hah, sorry, my mistake. OK, I don't mind change it to 50%:50%.
I was thinking MAP_SHARED is used more popular?
>
> > + do {
> > + addr = mmap(NULL, len, PROT_READ, flags, fd, off);
> > + e = (addr == MAP_FAILED) ? errno : 0;
> > + if (errno == ENOMEM && flags & MAP_PRIVATE) {
> > + /* turn to shared mapping if memeory is not enough for private mapping */
> > + flags = MAP_SHARED;
> > + } else if (errno == ENOMEM && len > sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> > + /* reduce mapping length, if memeory is not enough for shared mapping */
> > + len /= 2;
> > + }
> > + } while (errno == ENOMEM && len > sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE));
>
> No need to retry on mmap, just let it fail and print out failure
> message.
Because file size can be very large, but we have limited memory size.
So I was afraid mmap can't be run mostly. Especially for private mapping.
But OK, that's easier if return directly.
>
> > + if (e && v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread - mmap failed %s%s [%lld,%d,%s] %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, st, (long long)off, (int)len,
> > + (flags & MAP_PRIVATE) ? "MAP_PRIVATE" : "MAP_SHARED", e);
> > +
> > + if (addr != MAP_FAILED) {
> > + if ((buf = malloc(len)) != NULL) {
> > + memcpy(buf, addr, len);
> > + free(buf);
> > + }
> > + e = munmap(addr, len) < 0 ? errno : 0;
> > + if (e && v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread - munmap failed %s%s [%lld,%d] %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, st, (long long)off,
> > + (int)len, e);
> > + }
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mread %s%s [%lld,%d,%s] %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, st, (long long)off, (int)len,
> > + (flags & MAP_PRIVATE) ? "MAP_PRIVATE" : "MAP_SHARED", e);
> > +
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + close(fd);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > +mwrite_f(int opno, long r)
> > +{
> > + char *addr;
> > + int e;
> > + pathname_t f;
> > + int fd;
> > + size_t len;
> > + __int64_t lr;
> > + off64_t off;
> > + int flags;
> > + struct stat64 stb;
> > + int v;
> > + char st[1024];
> > +
> > + init_pathname(&f);
> > + if (!get_fname(FT_REGFILE, r, &f, NULL, NULL, &v)) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mwrite - no filename\n", procid, opno);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + fd = open_path(&f, O_WRONLY);
> > + e = fd < 0 ? errno : 0;
> > + check_cwd();
> > + if (fd < 0) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mwrite - open %s failed %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, e);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (fstat64(fd, &stb) < 0) {
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mwrite - fstat64 %s failed %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, errno);
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + close(fd);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + inode_info(st, sizeof(st), &stb, v);
> > + lr = ((__int64_t)random() << 32) + random();
> > + off = (off64_t)(lr % MIN(stb.st_size + (1024 * 1024), MAXFSIZE));
> > + off %= maxfsize;
> > + off &= (off64_t)(~(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) - 1));
> > + len = (size_t)(random() % MIN(maxfsize - off, FILELEN_MAX)) + 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * truncate file to the size we need to map and access,
> > + * keep away SIGBUS / SIGSEGV killing this process
> > + */
> > + e = truncate64_path(&f, off + len) < 0 ? errno : 0;
>
> This implies a truncate(2) operation in mwrite. I don't think we need
> this. Just mwrite within file size, let other operations like truncate
> and write to extend file size.
OK.
>
> > + /* try private file mappings with 20% rate */
> > + flags = (random() % 20) ? MAP_SHARED : MAP_PRIVATE;
>
> Again, this is 5%.
>
> > + do {
> > + addr = mmap(NULL, len, PROT_WRITE, flags, fd, off);
> > + e = (addr == MAP_FAILED) ? errno : 0;
> > + if (errno == ENOMEM && flags & MAP_PRIVATE) {
> > + /* turn to shared mapping if memeory is not enough for private mapping */
> > + flags = MAP_SHARED;
> > + } else if (errno == ENOMEM && len > sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> > + /* reduce mapping length, if memeory is not enough for shared mapping */
> > + len /= 2;
> > + }
> > + } while (errno == ENOMEM && len > sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE));
>
> And again, no need to retry on mmap failure, IMO, just let it fail.
OK.
>
> > + if (e && v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mwrite - mmap failed %s%s [%lld,%d,%s] %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, st, (long long)off, (int)len,
> > + (flags & MAP_PRIVATE) ? "MAP_PRIVATE" : "MAP_SHARED", e);
>
> Consider putting this flag translation into a "struct print_flags"? See
> struct print_flags falloc_flags [].
It looks make things more difficult. But OK, I'll try it.
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
> > +
> > + if (addr != MAP_FAILED) {
> > + memset(addr, nameseq & 0xff, len);
> > + e = munmap(addr, len) < 0 ? errno : 0;
> > + if (e && v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mwrite - munmap failed %s%s [%lld,%d] %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, st, (long long)off,
> > + (int)len, e);
> > + }
> > + if (v)
> > + printf("%d/%d: mwrite %s%s [%lld,%d,%s] %d\n",
> > + procid, opno, f.path, st, (long long)off, (int)len,
> > + (flags & MAP_PRIVATE) ? "MAP_PRIVATE" : "MAP_SHARED", e);
> > +
> > + free_pathname(&f);
> > + close(fd);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > punch_f(int opno, long r)
> > {
> > #ifdef HAVE_LINUX_FALLOC_H
> > diff --git a/src/global.h b/src/global.h
> > index f63246b..51d1e94 100644
> > --- a/src/global.h
> > +++ b/src/global.h
> > @@ -178,4 +178,8 @@
> >
> > #endif /* HAVE_LINUX_FALLOC_H */
> >
> > +#ifndef HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H
> > +#include <sys/mman.h>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #endif /* GLOBAL_H */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=-yMrTV4jriXR7ieyzzjV-QgHBD0UDw8ixoR77aMeAHE&m=lkITlTdZ5GLMs6hTeBruHcJo4KVTiiRB53y4qWFkduY&s=unrG1l-1WFHTIEW3Qltb9bmYSEvIo7ms-Xtvl7HQukA&e=
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=-yMrTV4jriXR7ieyzzjV-QgHBD0UDw8ixoR77aMeAHE&m=lkITlTdZ5GLMs6hTeBruHcJo4KVTiiRB53y4qWFkduY&s=unrG1l-1WFHTIEW3Qltb9bmYSEvIo7ms-Xtvl7HQukA&e=
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=-yMrTV4jriXR7ieyzzjV-QgHBD0UDw8ixoR77aMeAHE&m=lkITlTdZ5GLMs6hTeBruHcJo4KVTiiRB53y4qWFkduY&s=unrG1l-1WFHTIEW3Qltb9bmYSEvIo7ms-Xtvl7HQukA&e=
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 9:18 [PATCH v5 1/2] fsstress: add mwrite/mread into test operation list Zorro Lang
2017-03-21 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] xfs/068: skip new fsstress operations mwrite and mread Zorro Lang
2017-03-21 10:55 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-03-21 21:34 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-22 1:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-03-22 6:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] fsstress: add mwrite/mread into test operation list Eryu Guan
2017-03-22 14:59 ` Zorro Lang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322145918.GR21915@dhcp12-143.nay.redhat.com \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox