From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: btrfs: Check if btrfs will create inline-then-regular file extents
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:27:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405012723.GR22845@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170403030139.7677-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 11:01:39AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Btrfs allows inline file extent if and only if
> 1) It's at offset 0
> 2) It's smaller than min(max_inline, page_size)
> Although we don't specify if the size is before compression or after
> compression.
> At least according to current behavior, we are only limiting the size
> after compression.
> 3) It's the only file extent
> So that if we append existing inline extent, it should be converted
> to regular file extents.
>
> However several users in btrfs mail list have reported invalid inline
> file extent, which only meets the first two condition, but with regular
> file extents follows.
>
> The bug is here for a long long time, so long that we have modified
> kernel and btrfs-progs to accept such case, but it's still not designed
> behavior, and must be detected and fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Better to have btrfs developers review this too to see if it's a valid
test. Some comments inline from fstests perspective of view.
> ---
> tests/btrfs/140 | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/btrfs/140.out | 2 +
> tests/btrfs/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/140
> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/140.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/140 b/tests/btrfs/140
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..139df76
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/140
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test 140
> +#
> +# Check if btrfs will create inline-then-regular file layout.
> +#
> +# Btrfs only allows inline file extent if file is small enough, and any
> +# incoming write enlarges the file beyong max_inline should replace inline
> +# extents with regular extents.
> +# This is a long standing bug, so fsck won't detect it and kernel will allow
> +# normal read on it, but should be avoided.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2017 Fujitsu. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_btrfs_command inspect-internal dump-tree
> +
> +inline_size=2048
> +page_size=$(get_page_size)
> +src_subv="$SCRATCH_MNT/src"
> +dst_subv="$SCRATCH_MNT/dst"
> +runtime=$(($LOAD_FACTOR * 8)) #The possibility is over 80%, just in case
This confused me a bit, I thought test would run for $runtime seconds
and wanted to suggest s/LOAD_FACTOR/TIME_FACTOR, but runtime is really a
loop counter. Mind renaming it to something more obvious, like
loop_count?
> +corrupted=0
> +
> +do_test()
> +{
> + local ret
> + _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null >&1
^^^^ meant 2>&1 ?
> +
> + # specify max_inline and compress explicitly to create
> + # inlined compressed extent
> + _scratch_mount "-o max_inline=$inline_size,compress"
> +
Whitespace issue in above line.
> + # Subvolume id=257
> + _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume create $src_subv
> +
> + # Page sized data will be compressed to quite small size,
> + # which is about 50 bytes for 4K, 100 bytes for 64K,
> + # far smaller than $inline_size, causing a inlined compressed
> + # file extent
> + xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 $page_size" $src_subv/file > /dev/null
> + sync
$XFS_IO_PROG and use '-c fsync' to sync the file.
> +
> + # Subvolume id=258
> + _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $src_subv $dst_subv
> +
Whitespace issue.
> + # Append another page to file in snapshot, since its offset is not
> + # 0, it will cause regular extent, and should convert inline extent
> + # to regular too.
> + xfs_io -c "pwrite $page_size $page_size" $dst_subv/file > /dev/null
$XFS_IO_PROG
> + _scratch_unmount
> +
> + # Fsck won't report inline-then-regular as error, as it's so long
> + # standing that we have no choice but to accept.
> + # So here we use dump-tree to catch inline extent of $dst_subv, and
> + # we need piping stdout, call btrfs-progs directly
> + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG inspect-internal dump-tree -t 258 $SCRATCH_DEV \
> + > $tmp.dump_tree
> + if [[ $(cat $tmp.dump_tree | grep inline) ]]; then
if grep -q inline $tmp.dump_tree; then
> + cat $tmp.dump_tree >> $seqres.full
> + echo "Invalid inline file extent detected"
> + return 1
> + fi
> + return 0
> +}
> +
> +for i in $(seq 1 $runtime); do
> + do_test
> + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> + corrupted=$(($corrupted + 1))
> + fi
> +done
> +
> +if [ $corrupted -ne 0 ]; then
> + echo "Corruption possibility: $corrupted/$runtime" >> $seqres.full
> +fi
Hmm, I don't think $corrupted is needed, just echo the message to
$seqres.full unconditionally would be fine.
Thanks,
Eryu
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/140.out b/tests/btrfs/140.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..24e90bc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/140.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 140
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 641d826..e4c76e3 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -142,3 +142,4 @@
> 137 auto quick send
> 138 auto compress
> 139 auto qgroup
> +140 auto
> --
> 2.9.3
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 3:01 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs: Check if btrfs will create inline-then-regular file extents Qu Wenruo
2017-04-05 1:27 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-04-05 1:40 ` Qu Wenruo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-05 2:14 Qu Wenruo
2017-04-05 16:00 ` Filipe Manana
2017-04-05 16:25 ` Filipe Manana
2017-04-06 0:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-04-06 0:32 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170405012723.GR22845@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox