From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39748 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753160AbdDJJZa (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:25:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:25:28 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Code to allow cros-compilation on chromeOS Message-ID: <20170410092528.GE22845@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20170327113537.GR14226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> <20170404173722.23696-1-gwendal@chromium.org> <20170406111815.GK22845@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> <20170407041227.GN22845@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gwendal Grignou Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:41:59PM -0700, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > Reading stack overflow further, the fact AC_PACKAGE_GLOBALS and > AC_PACKAGE_UTILITIES are not defined are just the consequence of the > error. > When all work fine, the autoconfigued ./aclocal.m4 should contains > several m4_include and in particular > m4_include([m4/package_globals.m4])" that will load the definitions > for these macros. > I am shooting in the dark, how ./aclocal.m4 compares between RH7.0 and RH6.9? RHEL6.9: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/EUo-NKzoZPwbIIhn1bjoJF5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= RHEL7.3: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/SEhryYO0GXT8VIA0-24q8V5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= > What are the revisions of automake, autoconf, m4 andlibtoolize. [root@eguan-rhel6 xfstests]# rpm -q automake autoconf m4 libtool automake-1.11.1-4.el6.noarch autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch m4-1.4.13-5.el6.x86_64 libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 [root@dhcp-66-87-213 xfstests]# rpm -q automake autoconf m4 libtool automake-1.13.4-3.el7.noarch autoconf-2.69-11.el7.noarch m4-1.4.16-10.el7.x86_64 libtool-2.4.2-21.el7_2.x86_64 > Does autoreconf -fi help? No, autoreconf -fi has the same issue. > > Thanks for your help, > Gwendal. Thank you! Eryu