public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kernel-configs: switch to using defconfigs
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 00:39:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170519073911.GA28321@zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxiygvNT07ZWLss8nnNRe4VVNuhAF5WRLSpRP7vYffibyA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Amir,

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:05:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:32:29PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >>
> >> Currently, the kernel configs for kvm-xfstests and gce-xfstests are
> >> difficult to maintain because they are so long.  Fix this by changing
> >> them to 'defconfig' format, so they only list the non-default settings.
> >>
> >> As documented, there is one additional step introduced when building a
> >> kernel for the first time: you now must run 'make olddefconfig' after
> >> copying a defconfig file to .config.  However I think this is an
> >> acceptable tradeoff for having much more maintainable config files.
> >> Running 'make olddefconfig' also means that people won't have to answer
> >> random config questions if they're testing the latest kernel.
> >>
> >> This change was scripted by running 'make savedefconfig' for each config
> >> within the appropriate source tree (stable/linux-X.X-y).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > Thanks, applied.  (This patch was 1.4MB, so it would have been
> > rejected by vger.kernel.org.)
> >
> 
> Ted,
> 
> Applied where? github is 2 weeks behind. kernel.org is 2 weeks behind.
> 
> BTW, I am curious to know why the kernel-configs in this repository have
> no obvious debug config options.
> 
> Aren't you guys testing regularly with lockdep etc? does everyone carry
> their own home brewed debug configs like I do [1]?
> 
> What do you say about including -debug variants to the maintained
> kernel-configs in this repo? or turn on the obvious debugging features
> by default?
> 

There are already a number of debugging options turned on in the 4.9 x86_64
config, including lockdep, various other CONFIG_DEBUG_* options, and the crypto
self-tests.  It definitely should still be improved, though.  I've been planning
to go through it again and see if there are any other debug options that should
be turned on, as well as unused features which should be disabled.  Also the
older configs tend to be outdated and should be synced up with the latest (to
the extent that this is worthwhile; in simple cases, at least, it's pretty
easily scriptable).

We probably shouldn't enable the most expensive debug options like KASAN by
default, though.  Lockdep is fine.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-19  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 23:32 [PATCH 0/5] xfstests-bld: improvements to recommended kernel configs Eric Biggers
2017-05-17 23:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] kernel-configs: remove ext4- prefix from kernel-configs Eric Biggers
2017-05-18 18:45   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-05-17 23:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] kernel-configs: use CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-xfstests" Eric Biggers
2017-05-17 23:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] kernel-configs: enable f2fs support Eric Biggers
2017-05-18 18:51   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-05-17 23:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] kernel-configs: enable ubifs support Eric Biggers
2017-05-18 18:54   ` Theodore Ts'o
     [not found] ` <20170517233233.61244-2-ebiggers3@gmail.com>
2017-05-18 18:44   ` [PATCH 1/5] kernel-configs: switch to using defconfigs Theodore Ts'o
2017-05-19  7:05     ` Amir Goldstein
2017-05-19  7:39       ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2017-05-19  8:40         ` Amir Goldstein
2017-05-19 14:43       ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170519073911.GA28321@zzz \
    --to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox