From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36720 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751444AbdFHCvs (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:51:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:51:45 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: test Btrfs delalloc accounting overflow Message-ID: <20170608025145.GD19952@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20170607093645.GZ19952@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> <20170607173413.GA7481@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170607173413.GA7481@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Omar Sandoval Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com List-ID: On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:34:13AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:36:45PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:57:10PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > > From: Omar Sandoval > > > > > > This is a regression test for "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting > > > leak caused by u32 overflow". It creates a bunch of delalloc extents and > > > merges them together to make sure the accounting is done right. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval > > > > I refer to the patch by its commit id 8b8b08cbfb90 as well, and replaced > > xfs_io with $XFS_IO_PROG, and queued for next update. > > Hi, Eryu, > > 8b8b08cbfb90 is actually a different fix, my patch isn't upstream yet > (but Dave has it queued up for 4.13). Ahh, I see, I only searched "fix delalloc accounting" in commit log and didn't notice the difference between the rest of the log. Sorry about that, and thanks for the heads up! Eryu