From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: jlayton@kernel.org
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: add a less thorough testing mode for fsync-err program
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:58:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170703085827.GJ23360@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629132947.29939-1-jlayton@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:29:47AM -0400, jlayton@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
>
> Currently we just have this test run on a whitelist of filesystems, but
> it would be best to be able to run it on all of them. The problem is
> that a lot of filesystems basically shut down once they hit metadata
> errors.
>
> Allow the fsync-err testcase to operate in two different modes. One
> mode just does basic testing to ensure that we get an error back on
> all fd's when we fsync. The other does a more thorough test to ensure
> that we get back 0 on subsequent fsyncs when there hasn't been any
> write activity.
>
> For now, we just opt-in to the more thorough testing on certain
> filesystems: xfs, ext3 and ext4 on the generic test. All other
> filesystems will run in simple mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
> common/rc | 9 +++++++++
> src/fsync-err.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> tests/generic/441 | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 2972f89e9527..83675364cf24 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -1738,6 +1738,15 @@ _require_test()
> touch ${RESULT_DIR}/require_test
> }
>
> +_has_logdev()
> +{
> + ret=0
> + [ -z "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV" -o ! -b "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV" ] &&
> + [ "$USE_EXTERNAL" != yes ] && ret=1
This doesn't seem right. _has_logdev = ($SCRATCH_LOGDEV is block
device) && ($USE_EXTERNAL set to yes), so we should set ret=1 if any of
these conditions is not met. But this code returns 0 (true) if I only
have SCRATCH_LOGDEV set but not USE_EXTERNAL.
And once we have _has_logdev, I think we can refactor _require_logdev to
use _has_logdev too.
> +
> + return $ret
> +}
> +
> # this test needs a logdev
> #
> _require_logdev()
> diff --git a/src/fsync-err.c b/src/fsync-err.c
> index 5b3bdd3ada07..4b0205cf2fd4 100644
> --- a/src/fsync-err.c
> +++ b/src/fsync-err.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <getopt.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
>
> /*
> * btrfs has a fixed stripewidth of 64k, so we need to write enough data to
> @@ -25,7 +26,7 @@
>
> static void usage()
> {
> - printf("Usage: fsync-err [ -b bufsize ] [ -n num_fds ] -d dmerror path <filename>\n");
> + printf("Usage: fsync-err [ -b bufsize ] [ -n num_fds ] [ -s ] -d dmerror path <filename>\n");
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> @@ -35,8 +36,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> char *dmerror_path = NULL;
> char *cmdbuf;
> size_t cmdsize, bufsize = DEFAULT_BUFSIZE;
> + bool simple_mode = false;
>
> - while ((i = getopt(argc, argv, "b:d:n:")) != -1) {
> + while ((i = getopt(argc, argv, "b:d:n:s")) != -1) {
> switch (i) {
> case 'b':
> bufsize = strtol(optarg, &buf, 0);
> @@ -55,6 +57,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> return 1;
> }
> break;
> + case 's':
> + /*
> + * Many filesystems will continue to throw errors after
> + * fsync has already advanced to the current error,
> + * due to metadata writeback failures or other
> + * issues. Allow those fs' to opt out of more thorough
> + * testing.
> + */
> + simple_mode = true;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -154,16 +165,18 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> }
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < numfds; ++i) {
> - ret = fsync(fd[i]);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - /*
> - * We did a failed write and fsync on each fd before.
> - * Now the error should be clear since we've not done
> - * any writes since then.
> - */
> - printf("Third fsync on fd[%d] failed: %m\n", i);
> - return 1;
> + if (!simple_mode) {
> + for (i = 0; i < numfds; ++i) {
> + ret = fsync(fd[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /*
> + * We did a failed write and fsync on each fd before.
> + * Now the error should be clear since we've not done
> + * any writes since then.
> + */
> + printf("Third fsync on fd[%d] failed: %m\n", i);
> + return 1;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -185,12 +198,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> return 1;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < numfds; ++i) {
> - ret = fsync(fd[i]);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - /* The error should still be clear */
> - printf("fsync after healing device on fd[%d] failed: %m\n", i);
> - return 1;
> + if (!simple_mode) {
> + for (i = 0; i < numfds; ++i) {
> + ret = fsync(fd[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /* The error should still be clear */
> + printf("fsync after healing device on fd[%d] failed: %m\n", i);
> + return 1;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/441 b/tests/generic/441
> index 2215b64db9a7..e8244224e097 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/441
> +++ b/tests/generic/441
> @@ -45,15 +45,23 @@ _cleanup()
> . ./common/dmerror
>
> # real QA test starts here
> -_supported_fs ext2 ext3 ext4 xfs
> _supported_os Linux
> _require_scratch
>
> -# Generally, we want to avoid journal errors in this test. Ensure that
> -# journalled fs' have a logdev.
> -if [ "$FSTYP" != "ext2" ]; then
> - _require_logdev
> -fi
> +# Generally, we want to avoid journal errors on the extended testcase. Only
> +# set the -r flag if we have a logdev
> +sflag='-s'
This part seems confusing, comments said "set the -r flag" but '-s' is
actually used.
> +case $FSTYP in
> + btrfs)
> + _notrun "btrfs has a specialized test for this"
> + ;;
> + ext3|ext4|xfs)
> + # Do the more thorough test if we have a logdev
> + _has_logdev && sflag=''
> + ;;
> + *)
> + ;;
> +esac
>
> _require_dm_target error
> _require_test_program fsync-err
> @@ -70,7 +78,7 @@ _require_fs_space $SCRATCH_MNT 65536
>
> testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/fsync-err-test
>
> -$here/src/fsync-err -d $here/src/dmerror $testfile
> +$here/src/fsync-err $sflag -d $here/src/dmerror $testfile
Better to append this command to $seqres.full too for debug purpose, so
we know if we're running with or without '-s' option.
Thanks,
Eryu
>
> # success, all done
> _dmerror_load_working_table
> --
> 2.13.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-29 13:29 [PATCH] generic: add a less thorough testing mode for fsync-err program jlayton
2017-07-03 8:58 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-07-17 18:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170703085827.GJ23360@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox