From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfs test: Buffer resubmittion test
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170703153200.14423-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi folks,
this is the xfstests case for the buffer resubmition failures with
dm-thin I'm working on.
I used test 999 to avoid the need of changing the test number between
revisions. I don't write a xfstest for a while, so I am not sure if the
test is ok as it is.
It is doing its job though :) Passing with a kernel using my last
patches for the problem (although they still need revision), and hanging
up when the test is executed with a kernel without my patches, so be
careful to try it.
Thoughts?
Cheers
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
---
tests/xfs/999 | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/xfs/999.out | 2 ++
tests/xfs/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/xfs/999
create mode 100644 tests/xfs/999.out
diff --git a/tests/xfs/999 b/tests/xfs/999
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..5ae8b74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/999
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# FS QA Test 999
+#
+# Test buffer resubmission after a failed writeback with to a full overcommited
+# dm-thin device.
+#
+# This test will hang the filesystem when ran on an unpatched kernel
+#
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Copyright (c) 2017 YOUR NAME HERE. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+# published by the Free Software Foundation.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
+# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ cd /
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+ $UMOUNT_PROG $mnt >/dev/null 2>&1
+ $LVM_PROG vgremove -ff $vgname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+ $LVM_PROG pvremove -ff $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+
+# real QA test starts here
+
+# Modify as appropriate.
+_supported_fs xfs
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+_require_dm_target thin-pool
+_require_command $LVM_PROG lvm
+
+# remove previous $seqres.full before test
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+vgname=vg_$seq
+lvname=lv_$seq
+poolname=pool_$seq
+snapname=snap_$seq
+origpsize=100
+virtsize=200
+newpsize=200
+mnt=$SCRATCH_DIR/mnt_$seq
+mkdir -p $mnt
+
+#Ensure we have enough disk space
+_scratch_mkfs_sized $((250 * 1024 * 1024)) >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+
+$LVM_PROG pvcreate -f $SCRATCH_DEV >/dev/null 2>&1
+$LVM_PROG vgcreate -f $vgname $SCRATCH_DEV >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+$LVM_PROG lvcreate --thinpool $poolname --errorwhenfull y --zero n \
+-L $origpsize --poolmetadatasize 4M $vgname >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+$LVM_PROG lvcreate --virtualsize $virtsize -T $vgname/$poolname \
+-n $lvname >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+_mkfs_dev /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+$LVM_PROG lvcreate -k n -s $vgname/$lvname -n $snapname >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+_mount /dev/mapper/$vgname-$snapname $mnt
+
+xfs_io -f -d -c 'pwrite -b 1m 0 120m' $mnt/f1 >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+fsfreeze -f $mnt &
+
+#Wait fsfreeze to its job
+sleep 10
+
+lvextend -L $newpsize $vgname/$poolname >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+fsfreeze -u $mnt
+echo "Test OK"
+
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/xfs/999.out b/tests/xfs/999.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c3c938
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/999.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 999
+Test OK
diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
index 792161a..2bde916 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/group
+++ b/tests/xfs/group
@@ -416,3 +416,4 @@
416 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_scrub dangerous_repair
417 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
418 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_scrub dangerous_repair
+999 dangerous
--
2.9.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-03 15:32 Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2017-07-05 12:50 ` [PATCH] xfs test: Buffer resubmittion test Brian Foster
2017-07-05 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-07 9:24 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-07-07 10:21 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-07 10:26 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170703153200.14423-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--to=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox