public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] overlay: test dropping nlink below zero
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:09:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705100936.GS23360@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499168434-23859-8-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:40:34PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> nlink of overlay inode could be dropped indefinety by adding
> un-accounted lower hardlinks underneath a mounted overlay and
> trying to remove them.

Sorry, I didn't quite follow the hardlink patches, could you please
describe what is "accounted/un-accounted" hardlinks and the expected
behavior in commit log? And what does "indefinety" mean? I couldn't find
it in dictionary.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/overlay/034     | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/overlay/034.out |  2 ++
>  tests/overlay/group   |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/overlay/034
>  create mode 100644 tests/overlay/034.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/overlay/034 b/tests/overlay/034
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..cb023bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/overlay/034
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test 034
> +#
> +# Test overlay nlink when adding lower hardlinks.
> +#
> +# nlink of overlay inode could be dropped indefinety by adding
> +# unaccounted lower hardlinks underneath a mounted overlay and
> +# trying to remove them.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (C) 2017 CTERA Networks. All Rights Reserved.
> +# Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs overlay
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +# Remove all files from previous tests
> +_scratch_mkfs
> +
> +# Create lower hardlink
> +lowerdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_LOWER
> +mkdir -p $lowerdir
> +touch $lowerdir/0
> +ln $lowerdir/0 $lowerdir/1
> +
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Copy up lower hardlink - nlink should be 2
> +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/0
> +
> +# Add lower hardlinks while overlay is mounted

Why "while overlay is mounted" is needed?

> +ln $lowerdir/0 $lowerdir/2
> +ln $lowerdir/0 $lowerdir/3
> +
> +# Unlink un-accounted lowers to drive nlink to 0
> +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/2
> +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/3

drive nlink of which file to 0? Sorry, I'm a bit lost on overlay
hardlink behaviors..

> +
> +# Check for getting ENOENT for trying to link !I_LINKABLE with nlink 0
> +ln $SCRATCH_MNT/0 $SCRATCH_MNT/4

Shouldn't we expect an error message from this ln, if "check for getting
ENOEND"? BTW, this test passed on 4.12-rc7 kernel, I'm not sure if
that's expected result.

Thanks,
Eryu

> +
> +# Unlink all hardlink to drive nlink below 0
> +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/0
> +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/1
> +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/4
> +
> +# Verify that orphan index is cleaned on mount
> +_scratch_cycle_mount
> +ls $OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK/index 2>/dev/null
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/overlay/034.out b/tests/overlay/034.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4c8873c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/overlay/034.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 034
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/overlay/group b/tests/overlay/group
> index 35cd5a5..b55ed0c 100644
> --- a/tests/overlay/group
> +++ b/tests/overlay/group
> @@ -36,3 +36,4 @@
>  031 auto quick whiteout
>  032 auto quick copyup hardlink
>  033 auto quick copyup hardlink
> +034 auto quick copyup hardlink
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-04 11:40 [PATCH v2 0/7] overlay hardlink tests Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] overlay/018: re-factor and add to hardlink group Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] overlay/018: print hardlink content to golden output Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] overlay/018: test broken hardlinks after mount cycle Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] overlay/018: test lower hardlinks re-unite on copy up Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] overlay: test concurrent copy up of lower hardlinks Amir Goldstein
2017-07-05  9:59   ` Eryu Guan
2017-07-05 10:46     ` Amir Goldstein
2017-07-05 11:32       ` Eryu Guan
2017-07-05 11:49         ` Amir Goldstein
2017-07-11 20:23       ` Amir Goldstein
2017-07-12  3:17         ` Eryu Guan
2017-07-12  6:11           ` Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] overlay: test nlink accounting of overlay hardlinks Amir Goldstein
2017-07-04 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] overlay: test dropping nlink below zero Amir Goldstein
2017-07-05 10:09   ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-07-05 11:17     ` Amir Goldstein
2017-07-05 11:29       ` Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170705100936.GS23360@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox