From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] xfs/realtime: Default rtinherit=1, add _require_no_rtinherit function
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:50:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170926105016.GK8034@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170925195625.756877-2-rwareing@fb.com>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:56:24PM -0700, Richard Wareing wrote:
> To better exercise the data path code of realtime subvolumes, we will
> set rtinherit=1 during mkfs calls. For tests which this is not desired
> we introduce a _require_no_rtinherit function to opt out of this
> behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * None
>
> common/rc | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tests/generic/250 | 1 +
> tests/generic/252 | 1 +
> tests/generic/427 | 1 +
> tests/generic/441 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/019 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/031 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/170 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/187 | 1 +
> 9 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I don't think we need an extra RT_INHERT flag, this is just one of the
normal test configurations and can be easily tested by setting correct
MKFS_OPTIONS, e.g.
MKFS_OPTIONS="-d rtinherit=1" ./check ...
Then we can check if MKFS_OPTIONS has rtinherit defined in
_require_no_rtinherit(), e.g.
_require_no_rtinherit()
{
echo "$MKFS_OPTIONS" | egrep -q "rtinherit([^=]|=1)" && \
_notrun "<notrun message here>"
}
Unfortunately, mkfs.xfs doesn't print rtinherit status at mkfs time,
otherwise we could check mkfs.xfs output directly.
And xfs/019 xfs/031 passed even with "-d rtinherit=1", and xfs/187
already _notrun with proper message, so seems they don't need
_require_no_rtinherit rule.
generic/427 fails because xfs_io prints out its write log, after
redirecting stdout of xfs_io to /dev/null, generic/427 passed for me
too, the xfs_io write is meant to write a special pattern to the disk
anyway.
For other tests that do need _require_no_rtinherit, a comment to explain
why this rule is needed would be good.
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-26 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-25 19:56 [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs/realtime: Add require_no_realtime function Richard Wareing
2017-09-25 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] xfs/realtime: Default rtinherit=1, add _require_no_rtinherit function Richard Wareing
2017-09-25 21:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-26 1:54 ` Richard Wareing
2017-09-26 10:50 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-09-25 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs/realtime: Fix direct invocations of xfs_repair Richard Wareing
2017-09-25 21:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-26 11:02 ` Eryu Guan
2017-09-25 21:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs/realtime: Add require_no_realtime function Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-26 2:25 ` Richard Wareing
2017-09-26 10:01 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170926105016.GK8034@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwareing@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox