public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: Omer Zilberberg <Omer.Zilberberg@netapp.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/4[13,62]: restore TEST mount options
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:08:21 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031220821.GB4094@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171031043758.GF17339@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:37:58PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 07:36:58AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:08:31AM +0200, Omer Zilberberg wrote:
> > > These tests locally change the TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS/MOUNT_OPTIONS
> > > environment variables, and run _test_cycle_mount. As a result, following
> > > tests using the TEST mount point may start with different mount options,
> > > depending on run order.
> > 
> > I don't think that's the case. The change of the environment
> > variable should only affect the current test process and it's
> > children. When the test exits, we go back to the environment of the
> > check process, where the TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS environment variable is
> > still correctly set, and all future tests inherit from that. i.e.:
> > 
> > $ export FOO=foo
> > $ echo $FOO
> > foo
> > $ bash
> > $ echo $FOO
> > foo
> > $ export FOO=bar
> > $ echo $FOO
> > bar
> > $ exit
> > $ echo $FOO
> > foo
> > $
> > 
> > And after each test, check runs _check_filesystems(), which cycles
> > the test mount, so for each new test process that is run they should
> > already start in the correct state...
> 
> I agreed, the changing of variables in a sub-shell won't affect the
> parent's copy, and check will restore the mounts with the untouched
> options.
> 
> But the problem is that _check_test_fs() will cycle mount TEST_DEV with
> MOUNT_OPTIONS not TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS, so if you have different mount
> options set for TEST_DEV and SCRATCH_DEV, you'll see mount options
> changed for TEST_DEV. e.g.

That's a bug in _check_test_fs() that needs fixing.

> MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o dax" TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS="" ./check generic/413 generic/445
> generic/445 mount TEST_DEV with "-o dax" too
> 
> MOUNT_OPTIONS="" TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS="-o dax" ./check generic/413 generic/445
> generic/445 mount TEST_DEV without "-o dax"
> 
> MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o dax" TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS="-o dax" ./check generic/413 generic/445
> both tests and both devices mount with "-o dax"
> 
> That's been discussed in this thread:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9742039/

Ok, so it definitely needs fixing - using MOUNT_OPTIONS with
the test device is just simply wrong.

> I think fixing _check_<fs>_filesystem() is the correct way. And I guess
> we can refactor out a common function and call it in
> _check_[xfs|btrfs|generic]_filesystem, pass the correct mount options
> based on what device we're working on.

check_xfs_filesystem already takes a mount option parameter. The
problem is that it's considered "extra" and appended to
MOUNT_OPTIONS. Should be simple to fix...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-30  8:08 [PATCH] generic/4[13,62]: restore TEST mount options Omer Zilberberg
2017-10-30 20:36 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-31  4:37   ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-31 10:25     ` Omer Zilberberg
2017-10-31 11:34       ` Eryu Guan
2017-11-01 12:06         ` Omer Zilberberg
2017-11-01 12:52           ` Eryu Guan
2017-11-01 15:03             ` Omer Zilberberg
2017-11-02 12:13               ` Eryu Guan
2017-11-05 14:20                 ` Omer Zilberberg
2017-10-31 22:08     ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171031220821.GB4094@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=Omer.Zilberberg@netapp.com \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox