From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: common/rc: fix device still mounted error with SCRATCH_DEV_POOL
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 23:10:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116071020.GA6721@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115062228.GA3102@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 02:22:28PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:04:59PM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> > One of btrfs tests, btrfs/011, uses SCRATCH_DEV_POOL and puts a non-SCRATCH_DEV
> > device as the first one when doing mkfs, and this makes
> > _require_scratch{_nocheck} fail to umount $SCRATCH_MNT since it checks mount
> > point with SCRATCH_DEV only, and for sure it finds nothing to umount and the
> > following tests complain about 'device still mounted' alike errors.
> >
> > Introduce a helper to address this special case where both btrfs and scratch
> > dev pool are in use.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
>
> Hmm, I didn't see this problem, I ran btrfs/011 then another tests that
> uses $SCRATCH_DEV, and the second test ran fine too. Can you please
> provide more details?
Sure, so I was using 4 devices of size being 2500M, btrfs/011 bailed
out when doing a cp due to enospc then _fail is called to abort the
test, and the mount point now is associated with a different device
other than SCRATCH_DEV, so that _require_scratch_nocheck in btrfs/012
was not able to umount SCRATCH_MNT.
>
> Anyway, I think we should fix btrfs/011 to either not use $SCRATCH_DEV
> in replace operations (AFAIK, other btrfs replace tests do this) or
> umount all devices before exit. And I noticed btrfs/011 does umount
> $SCRATCH_MNT at the end of workout(), so usually all should be fine
> (perhaps it would leave a device mounted if interrupted in the middle of
> test run, because _cleanup() doesn't do umount).
That's true, if you want, I could fix all btrfs replace tests to
umount SCRATCH_MNT right before exit.
thanks,
-liubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-13 1:04 [PATCH] fstests: common/rc: fix device still mounted error with SCRATCH_DEV_POOL Liu Bo
2018-01-15 6:22 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-15 17:20 ` David Sterba
2018-01-16 7:10 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2018-01-16 7:48 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180116071020.GA6721@lim.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox