From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:59124 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752368AbeARB2g (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:28:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:28:31 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" Subject: Re: ext4 quota tests fail with CONFIG_QFMT_V2=n Message-ID: <20180118012831.GF6948@thunk.org> References: <20180118010936.GA10649@vader> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180118010936.GA10649@vader> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Omar Sandoval Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Eryu Guan List-ID: On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 05:09:36PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > Hello, > > If I run xfstests on ext4 with a kernel with CONFIG_QFMT_V2=n, the following > tests fail: > > generic/082 > generic/219 > generic/230 > generic/231 > generic/232 > generic/233 > generic/234 > generic/235 > generic/244 > generic/270 > generic/382 > > Would it be possible to handle this case and skip the test instead? I'd like to ask a different question, which is there a reason to support CONFIG_QFMT_V1 && !CONFIG_QFMT_V2? Maybe we should just always enable CONFIG_QFMT_V2, and simplify the test matrix? - Ted