public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: xiao yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: eguan@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com, bfoster@redhat.com,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] common/filter: Factor out expected XFS warnings for assert
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:29:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118182915.GI5606@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516272595-3678-2-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:49:54PM +0800, xiao yang wrote:
> 1) Introduce _require_no_xfs_bug_on_assert helper to check if XFS is built
>    with CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL, and just call _require_no_xfs_debug if
>    /sys/fs/xfs/debug/bug_on_assert is not available.
> 
> 2) Apply _require_no_xfs_bug_on_assert in xfs/098 and xfs/115.
> 
> 3) Move filter_xfs_dmesg from xfs/098 to common/filter, and rename
>    it as _filter_assert_dmesg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: xiao yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  common/filter | 11 +++++++++++
>  common/xfs    | 12 ++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/098 | 20 ++++++++------------
>  tests/xfs/115 |  7 ++++---
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter
> index 8e1fdb4..53874a0 100644
> --- a/common/filter
> +++ b/common/filter
> @@ -570,5 +570,16 @@ _filter_aiodio_dmesg()
>  	    -e "s#$warn9#Intentional warnings in dio_complete#"
>  }
>  
> +# We generate assert related WARNINGs on purpose and make sure test doesn't fail
> +# because of these warnings. This is a helper for _check_dmesg() to filter out
> +# them.
> +_filter_assert_dmesg()
> +{
> +	local warn1="WARNING:.*fs/xfs/xfs_message\.c:.*asswarn.*"
> +	local warn2="WARNING:.*fs/xfs/xfs_message\.c:.*assfail.*"
> +	sed -e "s#$warn1#Intentional warnings in asswarn#" \
> +	    -e "s#$warn2#Intentional warnings in assfail#"
> +}
> +
>  # make sure this script returns success
>  /bin/true
> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> index ab58364..a0e03b6 100644
> --- a/common/xfs
> +++ b/common/xfs
> @@ -625,6 +625,18 @@ _require_no_xfs_debug()
>  	fi
>  }
>  
> +# Check if XFS is built with CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL
> +_require_no_xfs_bug_on_assert()
> +{
> +	if [ -f /sys/fs/xfs/debug/bug_on_assert ]; then
> +		grep -q "1" /sys/fs/xfs/debug/bug_on_assert && \
> +		   _notrun "Require XFS built without CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL"

This knob can be written, so perhaps we'd rather just set it to zero
instead of _notrun?

> +	else
> +	# Call _require_no_xfs_debug if bug_on_assert is not available

That much is obvious from the code, but the comment doesn't say much
about why we shift to _require_no_xfs_debug.  How about:

# Require that assertions will not hang the system.
#
# Note: Prior to the creation of CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL (and the sysfs
# knob bug_on_assert), assertions would always crash the system if XFS
# debug was enabled (CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y).  If a test is designed to
# trigger an assertion and the test designer does not want to hang
# fstests, skip the test.

--D

> +		_require_no_xfs_debug
> +	fi
> +}
> +
>  # Get a metadata field
>  # The first arg is the field name
>  # The rest of the arguments are xfs_db commands to find the metadata.
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/098 b/tests/xfs/098
> index 9bcd94b..ebb7ca7 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/098
> +++ b/tests/xfs/098
> @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ _cleanup()
>  _supported_fs xfs
>  _supported_os Linux
>  
> +# We corrupt XFS on purpose, and CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL built XFS
> +# would crash due to assert failure, so skip if we're testing on a
> +# CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL built XFS.
> +_require_no_xfs_bug_on_assert
>  _require_scratch
>  test -n "${FORCE_FUZZ}" || _require_scratch_xfs_crc
>  _require_attrs
> @@ -56,16 +60,6 @@ test -z "${FUZZ_ARGS}" && FUZZ_ARGS="-n 8 -3"
>  
>  rm -f $seqres.full
>  
> -# If we corrupt log on a CONFIG_XFS_WARN build, there will be mount related
> -# WARNINGs in dmesg as expected.  We don't want to simply _disable_dmesg_check
> -# which could miss other potential bugs, so filter out the intentional WARNINGs,
> -# make sure test doesn't fail because of this warning and fails on other WARNINGs.
> -filter_xfs_dmesg()
> -{
> -	local warn="WARNING:.*fs/xfs/xfs_message\.c:.*asswarn.*"
> -	sed -e "s#$warn#Intentional warnings in asswarn#"
> -}
> -
>  TESTDIR="${SCRATCH_MNT}/scratchdir"
>  TESTFILE="${TESTDIR}/testfile"
>  
> @@ -107,8 +101,10 @@ _scratch_mount 2>/dev/null && _fail "mount should not succeed"
>  echo "+ repair fs"
>  _repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>  
> -# mount may trigger related WARNINGs, so filter them.
> -_check_dmesg filter_xfs_dmesg
> +# We may trigger assert related WARNINGs if we corrupt log on a
> +# CONFIG_XFS_WARN or CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG(without CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL)
> +# build, so filter them.
> +_check_dmesg _filter_assert_dmesg
>  
>  echo "+ mount image (2)"
>  _scratch_mount
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/115 b/tests/xfs/115
> index 0e62628..5fe1fd5 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/115
> +++ b/tests/xfs/115
> @@ -52,9 +52,10 @@ rm -f $seqres.full
>  _supported_fs generic
>  _supported_os Linux
>  _require_scratch_nocheck
> -# we corrupt XFS on purpose, and debug built XFS would crash due to assert
> -# failure, so skip if we're testing on a debug built XFS
> -_require_no_xfs_debug
> +# We corrupt XFS on purpose, and CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL built XFS
> +# would crash due to assert failure, so skip if we're testing on a
> +# CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL built XFS.
> +_require_no_xfs_bug_on_assert
>  _disable_dmesg_check
>  
>  # Make sure we disable finobt if the filesystem supports it, otherwise, just
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-18 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11  8:25 [PATCH] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit xiao yang
2018-01-11 18:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-12  1:58   ` Xiao Yang
2018-01-12  6:14   ` [PATCH v2] syscalls/madvise09.c: Use custom mount point instead of /sys/fs/cgroup/memory xiao yang
2018-01-12  6:14     ` [PATCH v2] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit xiao yang
2018-01-12  6:19     ` [PATCH v2] syscalls/madvise09.c: Use custom mount point instead of /sys/fs/cgroup/memory Xiao Yang
2018-01-12  6:16   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] common/xfs: Check if write supports [-c|-d] option in xfs_db xiao yang
2018-01-12  6:16     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit xiao yang
2018-01-12  7:49       ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-12  8:36         ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-12  8:50           ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-12 16:41             ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-13  2:23             ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-15  6:29               ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-15  7:48                 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] common/xfs: Check if write supports [-c|-d] option in xfs_db xiao yang
2018-01-15  7:48                   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] common/filter: factor out expected XFS warnings for mount xiao yang
2018-01-15  7:48                   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit xiao yang
2018-01-15 12:45               ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Brian Foster
2018-01-15 21:03                 ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-16  4:02                   ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-16  6:41                     ` Xiao Yang
2018-01-16  7:26                     ` [PATCH v4 1/3] common/xfs: Check if write supports [-c|-d] option in xfs_db xiao yang
2018-01-16  7:26                       ` [PATCH v4 2/3] common/filter: factor out expected XFS warnings for mount xiao yang
2018-01-18  8:48                         ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-18  8:56                           ` Xiao Yang
2018-01-16  7:26                       ` [PATCH v4 3/3] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit xiao yang
2018-01-18  8:46                         ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-18 10:49                           ` [PATCH v5 1/3] common/xfs: Check if write supports [-c|-d] option in xfs_db xiao yang
2018-01-18 10:49                             ` [PATCH v5 2/3] common/filter: Factor out expected XFS warnings for assert xiao yang
2018-01-18 18:29                               ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-01-19  2:51                                 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-19  4:04                                 ` Xiao Yang
2018-01-19  5:38                                 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] common: Add _require_no_xfs_bug_on_assert && Factor out filter_xfs_dmesg xiao yang
2018-01-19  5:38                                   ` [PATCH v6 3/3] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit xiao yang
2018-01-18 10:49                             ` [PATCH v5 " xiao yang
2018-01-18 18:19                             ` [PATCH v5 1/3] common/xfs: Check if write supports [-c|-d] option in xfs_db Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16  8:50                     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: Regression test for invalid sb_logsunit Dave Chinner
2018-01-16 14:09                       ` Brian Foster
2018-01-18  8:44                         ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-16 13:58                   ` Brian Foster
2018-01-12  7:44     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] common/xfs: Check if write supports [-c|-d] option in xfs_db Eryu Guan
2018-01-12 16:43     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180118182915.GI5606@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox