From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] generic/403: don't spew '$GETFATTR_PROG: Killed' messages
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:58:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180125075845.GG18267@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151683801556.17051.2037237512407215800.stgit@magnolia>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:53:35PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> Use a runfile presence check to control the background getfattr loop
> instead of using kill -9. This helps us to avoid the problem that
> the controlling bash will print a process killed message, which wrecks
> the golden output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
I saw this failure in automatic fstests runs occasionally, but could
never reproduce it manually. Thanks for fixing it!
> ---
> tests/generic/403 | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/403 b/tests/generic/403
> index 17897ff..18fd1e5 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/403
> +++ b/tests/generic/403
> @@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ touch $SCRATCH_MNT/file
> $SETFATTR_PROG -n trusted.small -v a $SCRATCH_MNT/file
>
> # start a background getxattr loop for the existing xattr
> -while [ true ]; do
> +runfile="$tmp.getfattr"
> +touch $runfile
> +while [ -e $runfile ]; do
> $GETFATTR_PROG --absolute-names -n trusted.small $SCRATCH_MNT/file \
> > /dev/null || break
> done &
> @@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ for i in $(seq 0 99); do
> $SETFATTR_PROG -x trusted.big $SCRATCH_MNT/file
> done
>
> -kill -9 $getfattr_pid > /dev/null 2>&1
> +rm -rf $runfile
I changed it to 'rm -f $runfile', dropped '-r'.
Thanks,
Eryu
> wait > /dev/null 2>&1
>
> echo Silence is golden
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 23:53 [PATCH 0/5] xfstests: fixes and reflink quota tests Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-24 23:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] common/rc: report kmemleak errors Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-24 23:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs/122: fix xfs header ordering problems Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-24 23:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] generic/403: don't spew '$GETFATTR_PROG: Killed' messages Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-25 7:58 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2018-01-24 23:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs/24[356]: checking cow fork bmap requires CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-25 8:17 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-26 0:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-24 23:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: regression tests for reflink quota bugs Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-26 6:49 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-26 7:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180125075845.GG18267@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox