From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58806 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbeBFHlT (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 02:41:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:41:18 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: xfstests failures Message-ID: <20180206074118.GP18267@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <94286394-157a-421b-7f73-52f10529f23f@intel.com> <20180206035443.GN18267@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> <20180206061320.zlma3t55ymtmhyeo@destitution> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180206061320.zlma3t55ymtmhyeo@destitution> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Cc: Dave Jiang , fstests@vger.kernel.org, "Zwisler, Ross" List-ID: On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:13:20PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:54:43AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:40:40PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > xfs/191-input-validation > > > > This tests mkfs.xfs behavior and AFAIK it fails after Dave's mkfs > > refactor patchset, the test itself requires some fixes. > > It failed before it, too. I'd just mark this test as broken and It failed only with 4k-sector disk, but my memory may not be accurate.. > remove it for the auto group, because it isn't doing what I > originally intended it to be used for. Thanks for the info! Would you mind sending a patch for this? Thanks, Eryu