From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:40023 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751180AbeDRE3m (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:29:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id y66so268277pfi.7 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:29:38 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] common/xfs: Add require_xfs_db_write_array function Message-ID: <20180418042938.GM2932@desktop> References: <20180417040641.GA5210@magnolia> <1523945500-10819-1-git-send-email-xuyang.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <20180417175917.GD5201@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180417175917.GD5201@magnolia> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" , xuyang.jy@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:59:17AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:11:40PM +0800, yang xu wrote: > > xfsprogs commit 4222d00("db: write via array indexing doesn't > > work") fixes a bug that xfs_db write can't support array indexing. > > This function will check whether the bug is fixed on the current > > xfsprogs. > > > > xfs/444 applies the function, and skips if this bug exists. > > > > Signed-off-by: yang xu > > --- > > common/xfs | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > tests/xfs/444 | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs > > index 3169f87..0b59994 100644 > > --- a/common/xfs > > +++ b/common/xfs > > @@ -701,3 +701,20 @@ _scratch_xfs_set_sb_field() > > { > > _scratch_xfs_set_metadata_field "$1" "$2" "sb 0" > > } > > + > > +#Before xfsprogs commit 4222d000ed("db: write via array indexing doesn't work"), > > +##xfs_db command to write a specific AGFL index doesn't work. I'll add more comments here to explain why we require a bug fix instead of exposing the bug to users, e.g. "It's a bug in a diagnostic tool that is only used by XFS developers as a test infrastructure, so we can treat it as a infrastructure dependency as all other _require rules." > > +_require_xfs_db_write_array() > > +{ > > + local supported=0 > > + > > + _require_test > > + touch $TEST_DIR/$seq.img > > + $MKFS_XFS_PROG -d file,name=$TEST_DIR/$seq.img,size=512m >/dev/null 2>&1 > > + $XFS_DB_PROG -x -c "agfl 0" -c "write bno[32] 78" $TEST_DIR/$seq.img \ > > + >/dev/null 2>&1 > > + $XFS_DB_PROG -x -c "agfl 0" -c "print bno[32]" $TEST_DIR/$seq.img \ > > + | grep -q "bno\[32\] = 78" && supported=1 > > + rm -f $TEST_DIR/$seq.img > > + [ $supported -eq 0 ] && _notrun "xfs_db write can't support array" > > +} > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/444 b/tests/xfs/444 > > index 141be52..9700422 100755 > > --- a/tests/xfs/444 > > +++ b/tests/xfs/444 > > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ _supported_os Linux > > _require_check_dmesg > > _require_scratch > > _require_test_program "punch-alternating" > > +_require_xfs_db_write_array > > Looks ok, > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Thanks for the review! Eryu > > --D > > > > > # This is only a v5 filesystem problem > > _require_scratch_xfs_crc > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html