From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:42468 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbeEEWXv (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2018 18:23:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 18:23:47 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH] README: document the new default run mode Message-ID: <20180505222347.GO29205@thunk.org> References: <20180505001951.5665-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20180505140911.GE8373@desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180505140911.GE8373@desktop> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eryu Guan Cc: Amir Goldstein , Dave Chinner , fstests List-ID: On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:09:11PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > t > The 'dangerous' group and 'auto' group are not mutually exclusive when > it was introduced, see commit 3f28d55c3954 ("add freeze and dangerouss > groups"). But from previous discussions[1][2], they should be mutually > exclusive. What might be nice is if there was some way to declare that a test is dangerous given a particular kernel version (or some combination of kernel version and file system type). Right now I have to manually exclude tests when testing stable kernels, e.g.: gce-xfstests full --kernel gs://gce-xfstests/bzImage-3.18 -X generic/269 -X ext4/022 It's not a huge deal, and it's been on my todo list to add into the {gce,kvm,android}-xfstests framework, but perhaps it belongs in the core xfstests framework. - Ted