[PATCH v3] generic/486: Get rid of the redundant error=%d printing

Xiao Yang
2018-05-17T03:44:02Z

1) Without the fix, perror() can indicate the actual error(ENODATA).
2) After calling perror() and redirecting the output of perror()
to a file, errno seems to be set to EINVAL unexpectedly.
See the following mail for detailed info:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg09675.html

Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
src/attr_replace_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/attr_replace_test.c b/src/attr_replace_test.c
index 23adc07..0720bfd 100644
--- a/src/attr_replace_test.c
+++ b/src/attr_replace_test.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include <sys/stat.h>

#define die() do { perror(""); \
-fprintf(stderr, "error=%d at line %d\n", errno, __LINE__); \
+fprintf(stderr, "error at line %d\n", __LINE__); \
exit(1); } while (0)

#define fail(...) do { \
--
1.8.3.1