From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiaoli Feng <xifeng@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: skip atime related tests on CIFS
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:39:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607053957.GC2861@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2r5msb92E2e7gePY01qBPP4fJ0CKcEsnKLdnL1Ms8cUaQ4sA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:11:02PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> Agreed but I do want to follow up with Ronnie on loosely related question of
> how cifs and NFS and similar filesystems parse no op mount options like noatime
I take this as an ACK then, please let me know if you didn't really mean
that :)
Thank you both for review!
Eryu
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2018, 22:55 Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Xiaoli,
>
> I think it is fine to skip the atime tests for CIFS.
>
> The behaviour of atime/noatime for cifs is basically noatime always.
> When we read from the server the server will update the atime independently
> of
> cisf.ko but then any further reads that we do from cache will never push
> any updates
> to the server.
>
> Ronnie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Xiaoli Feng" <xifeng@redhat.com>
> > To: "Eryu Guan" <guaneryu@gmail.com>, "Leif Sahlberg" <
> lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
> > Sent: Monday, 28 May, 2018 4:40:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: skip atime related tests on CIFS
> >
> > Add Ronnie to to list.
> >
> > Hello Ronnie,
> > what's the expected behavior from CIFS on atime/noatime? We want to
> skip
> > the
> > atime related tests on cifs for xfstests just like nfs. But not sure if
> it's
> > correct. What do you think about it?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Eryu Guan" <guaneryu@gmail.com>
> > > To: "XiaoLi Feng" <xifeng@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2018 8:50:58 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: skip atime related tests on CIFS
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:23:56AM +0800, Xiaoli Feng wrote:
> > > > From: xiaoli feng <xifeng@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > The atime related mount options have no effect on cifs mounts
> > > > now or in the future. So skip these tests on CIFS.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: xiaoli feng <xifeng@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Looks fine to me. But I really need an ACK from cifs folks.
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > common/rc | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > > > index ffe5323..d3af55f 100644
> > > > --- a/common/rc
> > > > +++ b/common/rc
> > > > @@ -3244,6 +3244,8 @@ _require_atime()
> > > > _exclude_scratch_mount_option "noatime"
> > > > if [ "$FSTYP" == "nfs" ]; then
> > > > _notrun "atime related mount options have no effect on NFS"
> > > > + elif [ "$FSTYP" == "cifs" ]; then
> > > > + _notrun "atime related mount options have no effect on
> CIFS"
> > >
> > > Or just change the check to a case-switch on $FSTYP?
> >
> > Ok, I will change it on the next commit.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eryu
> > >
> > > > fi
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 1.8.3.1
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 3:23 [PATCH] common/rc: skip atime related tests on CIFS XiaoLi Feng
2018-05-27 12:50 ` Eryu Guan
2018-05-28 6:40 ` Xiaoli Feng
2018-05-28 23:26 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2018-05-31 3:18 ` Xiaoli Feng
[not found] ` <CAH2r5msb92E2e7gePY01qBPP4fJ0CKcEsnKLdnL1Ms8cUaQ4sA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-06-07 5:39 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180607053957.GC2861@desktop \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsahlber@redhat.com \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=xifeng@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).