From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/xfs: remove bad xfs_repair -t option
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:43:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710144311.GY32415@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180710094129.1052-1-zlang@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:41:29PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> The xfs_repair "-t" option shouldn't be used alone. An interval must
> follow the -t option, or xfs_repair will report errors. And only
> modify reporting interval is useless, if we don't enable ag_stride.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Makes sense to me, at least given the getopt arg ("t:") in xfs_repair.c.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know why we must need the -t option for xfs_repair, I can't
> find any description to explain it. But I can find an explanation
> about why we use "-t" for _xfs_check.
>
> # xfs_check runs out of memory on large files, so even providing the test
> # option (-t) to avoid indexing the free space trees doesn't make it pass on
> # large filesystems. Avoid it.
>
> The -t option for xfs_repair is totally different with it for
> xfs_check, maybe -m option is more useful if we think about the
> memory size.
>
> And the -t option need to work with -o ag_stride together. I'd like
> to remove the "-t" option directly, due to I really don't know why
> we need it, or how to give it a proper number.
>
> If the original author knows why we need it, and can give me some
> suggestions, please help.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
> common/xfs | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> index ecf54bbf..61a3c2d9 100644
> --- a/common/xfs
> +++ b/common/xfs
> @@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ _scratch_xfs_repair()
> SCRATCH_OPTIONS="-l$SCRATCH_LOGDEV"
> [ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_RTDEV" ] && \
> SCRATCH_OPTIONS=$SCRATCH_OPTIONS" -r$SCRATCH_RTDEV"
> - [ "$LARGE_SCRATCH_DEV" = yes ] && SCRATCH_OPTIONS=$SCRATCH_OPTIONS" -t"
> $XFS_REPAIR_PROG $SCRATCH_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> }
>
> --
> 2.14.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-10 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-10 9:41 [PATCH] common/xfs: remove bad xfs_repair -t option Zorro Lang
2018-07-10 14:43 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-07-10 14:43 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180710144311.GY32415@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox