public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs/288: _notrun if xfs_db can't write values into dir or attr
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 10:32:51 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180806003251.GB7395@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180731054119.13539-2-zlang@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 01:41:19PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> Commit b3cf8b72334fd35ef961869506e5a72ab398bc82 help xfs/288 to
> support v5 filesystems testing, but there're still some old
> distributions don't support xfs_db write '-d' option, or can't
> write values into dir/attr of v5 filesystems.
> 
> For compatible with older versions, skip this test on v5 xfs
> if xfs_db write can't write v5 XFS dir/attr.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Xiao found v1 can't work well on xfsprogs-4.9, due to 'write -d' can't
> write vaules into dir/attr of v5 filesystems before xfsprogs-4.13.
> 
> Only check "if write command has -d option" is not enough. So I write
> a function _require_xfs_db_write_da() to make sure current xfs_db
> can write dir/attr (not only on v5, but especially for v5).
> 
> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
>  common/xfs    | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/288 |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> index d971b4a8..95dcfd59 100644
> --- a/common/xfs
> +++ b/common/xfs
> @@ -720,6 +720,34 @@ _require_xfs_db_write_array()
>  	[ $supported -eq 0 ] && _notrun "xfs_db write can't support array"
>  }
>  
> +# Before xfsprogs commit 89baf918(xfs_db: write values into dir/attr blocks and
> +# recalculate CRCs), xfs_db write command can't write invalid data into dir/attr
> +# field of v5 filesystems. For some cases need to write dir/attr (especially crc
> +# enabled), use this _require at first.
> +_require_xfs_db_write_da()
> +{
> +	local inum
> +	local count
> +
> +	_require_scratch

Hiding this inside a another requires rule is kinda nasty. If the
test already used _require_scratch_nocheck, this will now cause the
test to check the scratch device at the end of the test.

And vice-versa - if you use _require_scratch_nocheck here, it will
break tests that have already called _require_scratch....

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-06  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-31  5:41 [PATCH v2 1/2] xfs/288: use -d option of xfs_db write command for v5 XFS Zorro Lang
2018-07-31  5:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs/288: _notrun if xfs_db can't write values into dir or attr Zorro Lang
2018-08-02  0:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-02  1:49     ` Zorro Lang
2018-08-02  5:14       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-02  7:10         ` Zorro Lang
2018-08-06  0:32   ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180806003251.GB7395@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox