From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:03:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212140330.GC35803@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211013647.22580-1-david@fromorbit.com>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:36:47PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> These tests create substantial file fragmentation as a result of
> application actions that defeat post-EOF preallocation
> optimisations. They are intended to replicate known vectors for
> these problems, and provide a check that the fragmentation levels
> have been controlled. The mitigations we make may not completely
> remove fragmentation (e.g. they may demonstrate speculative delalloc
> related extent size growth) so the checks don't assume we'll end up
> with perfect layouts and hence check for an exceptable level of
> fragmentation rather than none.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/xfs/500 | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/500.out | 9 +++++
> tests/xfs/501 | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/501.out | 9 +++++
> tests/xfs/502 | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/502.out | 9 +++++
> tests/xfs/503 | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/503.out | 33 ++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/group | 4 +++
> 9 files changed, 394 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/500
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/500.out
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/501
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/501.out
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/502
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/502.out
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/503
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/503.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/500 b/tests/xfs/500
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..d0802e86
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/500
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test xfs/500
> +#
> +# Post-EOF preallocation defeat test
> +#
...
> +workfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/file
> +nfiles=8
> +wsize=4096
> +wcnt=1000
> +
> +write_sync_file()
> +{
> + idx=$1
> +
> + for ((cnt=0; cnt<$wcnt; cnt++)); do
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -s -c "pwrite $((cnt * wsize)) $wsize" $workfile.$idx
> + done
> +}
> +
> +rm -f $workfile*
> +for ((n=0; n<$nfiles; n++)); do
> + write_sync_file $n > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> +done
> +wait
> +sync
I'm not a huge fan of seeing these global syncs sprinkled around tests
where they might not be needed. Are these here for a reason? If so, could
they be replaced with an xfs_io -c syncfs or some such?
> +
> +for ((n=0; n<$nfiles; n++)); do
> + count=$(_count_extents $workfile.$n)
> + # Acceptible extent count range is 1-40
> + _within_tolerance "file.$n extent count" $count 21 19 -v
> +done
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
...
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/502 b/tests/xfs/502
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..9f314a3d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/502
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
...
> +
> +# Write multiple files in parallel using O_DIRECT writes w/ extent size hints.
> +# Aim is to interleave allocations to fragment the files. O_DIRECT writes defeat
> +# the open/write/close heuristics in xfs_release() that prevent EOF block
> +# removal, so this should fragment badly. Typical problematic behaviour shows
> +# per-file extent counts of ~1000 (worst case) whilst fixed behaviour typically
> +# shows extent counts in the low single digits (almost best case)
> +#
This is essentially equivalent to the previous test, right? E.g.,
buffered writes with extsz hints essentially uses the same allocation
path as direct I/O with an extent size hint in current XFS. Of course
that may not always be so, but I wonder if these two could be combined.
Otherwise these all seem fine to me.
Brian
> +# Failure is determined by golden output mismatch from _within_tolerance().
> +
> +workfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/file
> +nfiles=8
> +wsize=4096
> +wcnt=1000
> +extent_size=16m
> +
> +write_direct_file()
> +{
> + idx=$1
> +
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "extsize $extent_size" $workfile.$idx
> + for ((cnt=0; cnt<$wcnt; cnt++)); do
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -d -c "pwrite $((cnt * wsize)) $wsize" $workfile.$idx
> + done
> +}
> +
> +rm -f $workfile*
> +for ((n=0; n<$nfiles; n++)); do
> + write_direct_file $n > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> +done
> +wait
> +sync
> +
> +for ((n=0; n<$nfiles; n++)); do
> + count=$(_count_extents $workfile.$n)
> + # Acceptible extent count range is 1-10
> + _within_tolerance "file.$n extent count" $count 2 1 8 -v
> +done
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/502.out b/tests/xfs/502.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..766a6efe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/502.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +QA output created by 502
> +file.0 extent count is in range
> +file.1 extent count is in range
> +file.2 extent count is in range
> +file.3 extent count is in range
> +file.4 extent count is in range
> +file.5 extent count is in range
> +file.6 extent count is in range
> +file.7 extent count is in range
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/503 b/tests/xfs/503
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..ad303551
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/503
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test xfs/503
> +#
> +# Post-EOF preallocation defeat test
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs 2>&1 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Write multiple files in parallel using synchronous buffered writes. Aim is to
> +# interleave allocations to fragment the files. Assuming we've fixed the
> +# sycnhronous write defeat, we can still trigger the same issue with a
> +# open/read/close on O_RDONLY files. We should not be triggering EOF
> +# preallocation removal on files we don't have permission to write, so until
> +# this is fixed it should fragment badly. Typical problematic behaviour shows
> +# per-file extent counts of 50-350 whilst fixed behaviour typically demonstrates
> +# post-eof speculative delalloc growth in extent size (~6 extents for 50MB
> +# file).
> +#
> +# Failure is determined by golden output mismatch from _within_tolerance().
> +
> +workfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/file
> +nfiles=32
> +wsize=4096
> +wcnt=1000
> +
> +write_file()
> +{
> + idx=$1
> +
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -s -c "pwrite -b 64k 0 50m" $workfile.$idx
> +}
> +
> +read_file()
> +{
> + idx=$1
> +
> + for ((cnt=0; cnt<$wcnt; cnt++)); do
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -r -c "pread 0 28" $workfile.$idx
> + done
> +}
> +
> +rm -f $workdir/file*
> +for ((n=0; n<$((nfiles)); n++)); do
> + write_file $n > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> + read_file $n > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> +done
> +wait
> +
> +for ((n=0; n<$nfiles; n++)); do
> + count=$(_count_extents $workfile.$n)
> + # Acceptible extent count range is 1-40
> + _within_tolerance "file.$n extent count" $count 6 5 10 -v
> +done
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/503.out b/tests/xfs/503.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..0089a698
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/503.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +QA output created by 503
> +file.0 extent count is in range
> +file.1 extent count is in range
> +file.2 extent count is in range
> +file.3 extent count is in range
> +file.4 extent count is in range
> +file.5 extent count is in range
> +file.6 extent count is in range
> +file.7 extent count is in range
> +file.8 extent count is in range
> +file.9 extent count is in range
> +file.10 extent count is in range
> +file.11 extent count is in range
> +file.12 extent count is in range
> +file.13 extent count is in range
> +file.14 extent count is in range
> +file.15 extent count is in range
> +file.16 extent count is in range
> +file.17 extent count is in range
> +file.18 extent count is in range
> +file.19 extent count is in range
> +file.20 extent count is in range
> +file.21 extent count is in range
> +file.22 extent count is in range
> +file.23 extent count is in range
> +file.24 extent count is in range
> +file.25 extent count is in range
> +file.26 extent count is in range
> +file.27 extent count is in range
> +file.28 extent count is in range
> +file.29 extent count is in range
> +file.30 extent count is in range
> +file.31 extent count is in range
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> index 7b7d69f1..d0d33d73 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/group
> +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> @@ -497,3 +497,7 @@
> 497 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
> 498 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_norepair
> 499 auto quick
> +500 auto prealloc rw
> +501 auto prealloc rw
> +502 auto prealloc rw
> +503 auto prealloc rw
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 1:36 [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Dave Chinner
2019-02-11 1:55 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-12 14:03 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-02-12 21:04 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-13 13:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-16 10:04 ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-17 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-23 5:38 xfs post-EOF block freeing fixes Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 5:38 ` [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 13:03 ` Zorro Lang
2024-06-24 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 8:45 xfs post-EOF block freeing fixes v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 8:45 ` [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 15:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-25 11:15 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-26 12:31 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-01 14:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-02 13:38 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-02 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-02 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-02 15:56 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-02 20:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-13 17:49 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-14 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 14:14 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-14 15:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-14 17:46 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-15 3:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190212140330.GC35803@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox