fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
@ 2019-05-09  5:26 Jeffle Xu
  2019-05-09  5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeffle Xu @ 2019-05-09  5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fstests; +Cc: darrick.wong, Jeffle Xu

We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
"./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.

Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
_scratch_shutdown().

Let me explain it clearly:

1. suppose the config is

```
export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
```

2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
/dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command

```
mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
-o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
```

3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
/dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
test.

4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.

5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
_require_scratch_shutdown

As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.

thx

Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 tests/generic/530 | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/generic/530 b/tests/generic/530
index b0d188b..56c6d32 100755
--- a/tests/generic/530
+++ b/tests/generic/530
@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ ulimit -n $max_files
 
 # Open a lot of unlinked files
 echo create >> $seqres.full
-$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT shutdown >> $seqres.full
+$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
+_scratch_shutdown -f
+
 
 # Unmount to prove that we can clean it all
 echo umount >> $seqres.full
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
  2019-05-09  5:26 [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay Jeffle Xu
@ 2019-05-09  5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
  2019-05-09  9:07   ` Amir Goldstein
  2019-05-09  8:59 ` Amir Goldstein
  2019-05-10  3:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeffle Xu
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2019-05-09  5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeffle Xu; +Cc: fstests

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:26:56PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
> "./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
> XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.
> 
> Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
> tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
> of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
> filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
> _scratch_shutdown().
> 
> Let me explain it clearly:
> 
> 1. suppose the config is
> 
> ```
> export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
> export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
> ```
> 
> 2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
> /dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
> mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command
> 
> ```
> mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
> -o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
> overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
> ```
> 
> 3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
> underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
> feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
> /dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
> test.
> 
> 4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
> actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
> filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
> XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.
> 
> 5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
> _require_scratch_shutdown
> 
> As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
> action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
> you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.

*OH*, it escaped my notice that _require_scratch_shutdown tests shutting
down the legs that overlayfs stands on, without testing the overlayfs
mount itself.  Sorry about that, and thanks for pointing that out.

Hmm, well, this test is really about creating a bunch of temp files on
SCRATCH_MNT and then shutting down the *SCRATCH_MNT* to see how it deals
with that.  I'm not sure why the _require helper special-cases overlayfs
to test something other than SCRATCH_MNT, so I think we (or I) need
clarification about why the helper does that, or possibly just a new
_require helper that actually checks SCRATCH_MNT itself.

TLDR: I thought that if _require_scratch_shutdown didn't stop the test
then it was ok for any program to use the shutdown ioctl on the scratch
mount, and was surprised when it didn't do this for overlayfs.

--D

> thx
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  tests/generic/530 | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/530 b/tests/generic/530
> index b0d188b..56c6d32 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/530
> +++ b/tests/generic/530
> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ ulimit -n $max_files
>  
>  # Open a lot of unlinked files
>  echo create >> $seqres.full
> -$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT shutdown >> $seqres.full
> +$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_shutdown -f
> +
>  
>  # Unmount to prove that we can clean it all
>  echo umount >> $seqres.full
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
  2019-05-09  5:26 [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay Jeffle Xu
  2019-05-09  5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2019-05-09  8:59 ` Amir Goldstein
  2019-05-10  5:05   ` Eryu Guan
  2019-05-10  3:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeffle Xu
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2019-05-09  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeffle Xu; +Cc: fstests, Darrick J. Wong, Chengguang Xu

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:29 AM Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
> "./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
> XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.
>
> Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
> tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
> of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
> filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
> _scratch_shutdown().
>
> Let me explain it clearly:
>
> 1. suppose the config is
>
> ```
> export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
> export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
> ```
>
> 2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
> /dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
> mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command
>
> ```
> mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
> -o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
> overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
> ```
>
> 3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
> underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
> feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
> /dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
> test.
>
> 4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
> actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
> filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
> XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.
>
> 5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
> _require_scratch_shutdown
>
> As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
> action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
> you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.
>

I think this is the correct solution (and not a workaround)
FWIW there are other operations (e.g. umount) when done directly and
not via common helpers would not have the same result when running
check -overlay.

I suggest that you remove the option 'shutdown' from t_open_tmpfiles
if shutdown can be done by test, so future tests won't use it.

There are 2 generic tests that use src/godown directly and not via
common shutdown helper. Those tests are skipped with -overlay due
to other unmet requirements, but as a general practice, using src/godown
directly should be avoided if possible.

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
  2019-05-09  5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2019-05-09  9:07   ` Amir Goldstein
  2019-05-09  9:09     ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2019-05-09  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong, Chengguang Xu; +Cc: Jeffle Xu, fstests

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:45 AM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:26:56PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> > We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
> > "./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
> > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.
> >
> > Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
> > tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
> > of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
> > filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
> > _scratch_shutdown().
> >
> > Let me explain it clearly:
> >
> > 1. suppose the config is
> >
> > ```
> > export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
> > export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
> > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
> > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
> > ```
> >
> > 2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
> > /dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
> > mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command
> >
> > ```
> > mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
> > -o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
> > overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
> > ```
> >
> > 3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
> > underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
> > feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
> > /dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
> > test.
> >
> > 4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
> > actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
> > filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
> > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.
> >
> > 5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
> > _require_scratch_shutdown
> >
> > As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
> > action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
> > you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.
>
> *OH*, it escaped my notice that _require_scratch_shutdown tests shutting
> down the legs that overlayfs stands on, without testing the overlayfs
> mount itself.  Sorry about that, and thanks for pointing that out.
>
> Hmm, well, this test is really about creating a bunch of temp files on
> SCRATCH_MNT and then shutting down the *SCRATCH_MNT* to see how it deals
> with that.  I'm not sure why the _require helper special-cases overlayfs
> to test something other than SCRATCH_MNT, so I think we (or I) need
> clarification about why the helper does that, or possibly just a new
> _require helper that actually checks SCRATCH_MNT itself.
>

The helper is doing the right thing as far as the tests that use the common
shutdown helpers are concerned.
When you yank the cord out of underlying fs, you effectively yank the cord
out of overlayfs, so shutdown tests can be run on overlay thanks to the fixes
made by Chengguang, helping with crash test coverage for overlayfs.

>From quick grep I found only 3 generic tests that issue goingdown via
binaries and not via common helper. This patch fixes one of them and the
other 2 tests (using src/godown) do not run on overlays, so it is low
priority to fix them.

Cheers,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
  2019-05-09  9:07   ` Amir Goldstein
@ 2019-05-09  9:09     ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2019-05-09  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Jeffle Xu, fstests, Chengguang Xu

CC uptodate email of Chengguang

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:07 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:45 AM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:26:56PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> > > We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
> > > "./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
> > > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.
> > >
> > > Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
> > > tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
> > > of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
> > > filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
> > > _scratch_shutdown().
> > >
> > > Let me explain it clearly:
> > >
> > > 1. suppose the config is
> > >
> > > ```
> > > export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
> > > export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
> > > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
> > > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
> > > ```
> > >
> > > 2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
> > > /dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
> > > mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command
> > >
> > > ```
> > > mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
> > > -o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
> > > overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
> > > ```
> > >
> > > 3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
> > > underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
> > > feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
> > > /dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
> > > test.
> > >
> > > 4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
> > > actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
> > > filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
> > > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.
> > >
> > > 5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
> > > _require_scratch_shutdown
> > >
> > > As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
> > > action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
> > > you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.
> >
> > *OH*, it escaped my notice that _require_scratch_shutdown tests shutting
> > down the legs that overlayfs stands on, without testing the overlayfs
> > mount itself.  Sorry about that, and thanks for pointing that out.
> >
> > Hmm, well, this test is really about creating a bunch of temp files on
> > SCRATCH_MNT and then shutting down the *SCRATCH_MNT* to see how it deals
> > with that.  I'm not sure why the _require helper special-cases overlayfs
> > to test something other than SCRATCH_MNT, so I think we (or I) need
> > clarification about why the helper does that, or possibly just a new
> > _require helper that actually checks SCRATCH_MNT itself.
> >
>
> The helper is doing the right thing as far as the tests that use the common
> shutdown helpers are concerned.
> When you yank the cord out of underlying fs, you effectively yank the cord
> out of overlayfs, so shutdown tests can be run on overlay thanks to the fixes
> made by Chengguang, helping with crash test coverage for overlayfs.
>
> From quick grep I found only 3 generic tests that issue goingdown via
> binaries and not via common helper. This patch fixes one of them and the
> other 2 tests (using src/godown) do not run on overlays, so it is low
> priority to fix them.
>
> Cheers,
> Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
  2019-05-09  5:26 [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay Jeffle Xu
  2019-05-09  5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
  2019-05-09  8:59 ` Amir Goldstein
@ 2019-05-10  3:17 ` Jeffle Xu
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeffle Xu @ 2019-05-10  3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fstests; +Cc: darrick.wong, cgxu519, amir73il, caspar, Jeffle Xu

Testcases are recommended to use  _require_scratch_shutdown()
and _scratch_shutdown() pair helper function to test and execute
shutdown.

generic/530 formmerly used _require_scratch_shutdown() to test
whether the filesystem supports shutdown or not, while executed
the shutdown action in a raw binary (src/t_open_tmpfiles) rather
than the recommended _scratch_shutdown() helper. This will cause
a "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" error message when
testing overlay filesystem.

This patch simply move the shutdown action from the raw binary
into the packaged _scratch_shutdown() helper. That is, we remove
the "shutdown" interface of t_open_tmpfiles.c and call
_scratch_shutdown() in genric/530 and xfs/501.

I did some tests on this patch. ext4 and overlay pass generic/530
and generic/531. However there is some problem with xfs, even in
the original version (that is, without this patch applied).

When I run "./check xfs/501" or "./check xfs/502" with xfs, I get
the follwing error message

```
FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 iZuf6h1kfgutxc3el68z2lZ 4.19.36+
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdc /mnt/scratch

xfs/501 [not run] XFS error injection iunlink_fallback unknown on this
kernel.
```

And when I run "./check generic/530" or "./check generic/531" with
xfs, I get the following error message

```
 ./check generic/530
FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 iZuf6h1kfgutxc3el68z2lZ 4.19.36+
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdc /mnt/scratch

generic/530 1s ...
Message from syslogd@iZuf6h1kfgutxc3el68z2lZ at May 10 10:01:33 ...
 kernel:XFS: Assertion failed: VFS_I(ip)->i_nlink == 0, file:
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c, line: 5074
```

and the kernel just hangs

```
[   28.064762] XFS (vdc): Unmounting Filesystem
[   28.114884] XFS (vdc): Mounting V5 Filesystem
[   28.153505] XFS (vdc): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
[   28.191680] XFS: Assertion failed: VFS_I(ip)->i_nlink == 0, file:
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c, line: 5074
[   28.193064] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   28.193655] kernel BUG at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102!
[   28.194302] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[   28.195226] CPU: 13 PID: 2292 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.19.36+ #82
[   28.196392] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/24
[   28.198323] RIP: 0010:assfail+0x28/0x30
[   28.198801] Code: c3 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f1 41 89 d0 48 c7 c6 88
e9 0a b5 48 89 fa 31 ff e8 84 fa ff ff 80 3d 55 e7 eea
[   28.201330] RSP: 0018:ffffa23a8378fc90 EFLAGS: 00010202
[   28.202009] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: ffff903e2688bc00 RCX:
0000000000000000
[   28.202943] RDX: 00000000ffffffc0 RSI: 000000000000000a RDI:
ffffffffb5067827
[   28.203884] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[   28.204815] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: f000000000000000 R12:
0000000000000000
[   28.205713] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff903e2747a200 R15:
0000000000000000
[   28.206643] FS:  00007f828026d880(0000) GS:ffff903e3bb40000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[   28.207704] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   28.208443] CR2: 00007f827f55f8f3 CR3: 0000000139f22006 CR4:
00000000003606a0
[   28.209370] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[   28.210301] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[   28.211231] Call Trace:
[   28.211524]  xlog_recover_process_one_iunlink+0x122/0x150
[   28.212224]  ? up+0x12/0x60
[   28.212549]  xlog_recover_process_iunlinks.isra.28+0x70/0xa0
[   28.213272]  xlog_recover_finish+0x33/0xa0
[   28.213778]  xfs_log_mount_finish+0x6f/0x110
[   28.214315]  xfs_mountfs+0x611/0x890
[   28.214739]  xfs_fs_fill_super+0x463/0x620
[   28.215245]  ? xfs_test_remount_options+0x60/0x60
[   28.215833]  mount_bdev+0x170/0x1a0
[   28.216266]  mount_fs+0x36/0x140
```

Is there some indication?

-------------------------
Following is the old commit message:

We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
"./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.

Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
_scratch_shutdown().

Let me explain it clearly:

1. suppose the config is

```
export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
```

2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
/dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command

```
mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
-o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
```

3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
/dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
test.

4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.

5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
_require_scratch_shutdown

As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.

thx

Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 src/t_open_tmpfiles.c | 19 -------------------
 tests/generic/530     |  4 +++-
 tests/xfs/501         |  4 +++-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/t_open_tmpfiles.c b/src/t_open_tmpfiles.c
index da9390f..0393c6b 100644
--- a/src/t_open_tmpfiles.c
+++ b/src/t_open_tmpfiles.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ static int min_fd = -1;
 static int max_fd = -1;
 static unsigned int nr_opened = 0;
 static float start_time;
-static int shutdown_fs = 0;
 
 void clock_time(float *time)
 {
@@ -69,22 +68,6 @@ void die(void)
 				end_time - start_time);
 		fflush(stdout);
 
-		if (shutdown_fs) {
-			/*
-			 * Flush the log so that we have to process the
-			 * unlinked inodes the next time we mount.
-			 */
-			int flag = XFS_FSOP_GOING_FLAGS_LOGFLUSH;
-			int ret;
-
-			ret = ioctl(min_fd, XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN, &flag);
-			if (ret) {
-				perror("shutdown");
-				exit(2);
-			}
-			exit(0);
-		}
-
 		clock_time(&start_time);
 		for (fd = min_fd; fd <= max_fd; fd++)
 			close(fd);
@@ -160,8 +143,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 		if (ret)
 			perror(argv[1]);
 	}
-	if (argc > 2 && !strcmp(argv[2], "shutdown"))
-		shutdown_fs = 1;
 
 	clock_time(&start_time);
 	while (1)
diff --git a/tests/generic/530 b/tests/generic/530
index b0d188b..56c6d32 100755
--- a/tests/generic/530
+++ b/tests/generic/530
@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ ulimit -n $max_files
 
 # Open a lot of unlinked files
 echo create >> $seqres.full
-$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT shutdown >> $seqres.full
+$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
+_scratch_shutdown -f
+
 
 # Unmount to prove that we can clean it all
 echo umount >> $seqres.full
diff --git a/tests/xfs/501 b/tests/xfs/501
index 974f341..4be9997 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/501
+++ b/tests/xfs/501
@@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ ulimit -n $max_files
 
 # Open a lot of unlinked files
 echo create >> $seqres.full
-$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT shutdown >> $seqres.full
+$here/src/t_open_tmpfiles $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
+_scratch_shutdown -f
+
 
 # Unmount to prove that we can clean it all
 echo umount >> $seqres.full
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay
  2019-05-09  8:59 ` Amir Goldstein
@ 2019-05-10  5:05   ` Eryu Guan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eryu Guan @ 2019-05-10  5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: Jeffle Xu, fstests, Darrick J. Wong, Chengguang Xu

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:59:31AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:29 AM Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > We got "shutdown: Inappropriate ioctl for device" when running
> > "./check -overlay generic/530". The error message is due to the
> > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl used in generic/530.
> >
> > Though _require_scratch_shutdown() is called to test whether the
> > tested filesystem supports XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl or not, a piece
> > of C code snippet in src/t_open_tmpfiles.c is used to shutdown the
> > filesysetm, rather than calling the corresponding helper function
> > _scratch_shutdown().
> >
> > Let me explain it clearly:
> >
> > 1. suppose the config is
> >
> > ```
> > export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb
> > export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
> > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdc
> > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
> > ```
> >
> > 2. When running "./check -overlay generic/530", the scratch device,
> > /dev/vdc is mounted on /mnt/scratch, and the overlay filesystem is
> > mounted on /mnt/scratch/mnt using the follwing command
> >
> > ```
> > mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-lower \
> > -o upperdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-upper/ -o workdir=/mnt/scratch/ovl-work/ \
> > overlay /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt
> > ```
> >
> > 3. In this case, _require_scratch_shutdown() will inspect whether the
> > underlying upper system, that is **/mnt/scratch/**, supports shutdown
> > feature or not. In my test, the underlying system of overlay (that is
> > /dev/vdc) is ext4, and thus it passes the _require_scratch_shutdown
> > test.
> >
> > 4. However, the C code executing the shutdown action in t_open_tmpfiles.c
> > actually execute XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl on the mount point of overlay
> > filesystem, that is **/mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt**. Since overlay doesn't support
> > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl, it fails naturally.
> >
> > 5. So we should use _scratch_shutdown() to shutdown if we have used
> > _require_scratch_shutdown
> >
> > As for the solution to fix the failure, I temporarily move the shutdown
> > action from t_open_tmpfiles into generic/530 as the workaround. How would
> > you think @Darrick? Maybe there is a better solution but I'm not sure.
> >
> 
> I think this is the correct solution (and not a workaround)
> FWIW there are other operations (e.g. umount) when done directly and
> not via common helpers would not have the same result when running
> check -overlay.

I agreed.

> 
> I suggest that you remove the option 'shutdown' from t_open_tmpfiles
> if shutdown can be done by test, so future tests won't use it.
> 
> There are 2 generic tests that use src/godown directly and not via
> common shutdown helper. Those tests are skipped with -overlay due
> to other unmet requirements, but as a general practice, using src/godown
> directly should be avoided if possible.

Yeah, makes sense to me, thanks!

Eryu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-10  5:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-09  5:26 [PATCH] generic/530: fix shutdown failure of generic/530 in overlay Jeffle Xu
2019-05-09  5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-09  9:07   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-09  9:09     ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-09  8:59 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-10  5:05   ` Eryu Guan
2019-05-10  3:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeffle Xu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).