From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:49768 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727211AbfFPUCA (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:02:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:01:54 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] shared/012: Add tests for filename casefolding feature Message-ID: <20190616200154.GA7251@mit.edu> References: <20190612184033.21845-1-krisman@collabora.com> <20190612184033.21845-2-krisman@collabora.com> <20190616144440.GD15846@desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190616144440.GD15846@desktop> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eryu Guan Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Lakshmipathi.G" List-ID: On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:44:40PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:40:33PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > Test looks good to me, and test passes for me with v5.2-rc4 kernel and > latest e2fsprogs, thanks! Just that, I moved the test to generic, as we > have all the needed _require rules ready to _notrun on unsupported fs, > so it's ready to be generic. (Sorry I was not involved with the > ext4-shared-generic discussion in the first place) Just to clear up my confusion, what's the distinction between shared and generic? Is it that if there are explicit "only run this test on file systems xxx, yyy, and zzz declarations", then it should be shared, and otherwise it should be in generic? - Ted