public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: fallocate two bytes at block boundary
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:06:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926160613.GF9913@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8cf492f-e3e0-e96f-f8f9-49b42b546cf0@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 06:02:17PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 26.09.19 17:55, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:29:27PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> >> Allocating two bytes at a block boundary with fallocate should allocate
> >> both blocks involved.  Test this by writing both bytes with dd
> >> afterwards and see whether the on-disk size increases (it should not).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  tests/generic/568     | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  tests/generic/568.out |  2 ++
> >>  tests/generic/group   |  1 +
> >>  3 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/568
> >>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/568.out
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/generic/568 b/tests/generic/568
> >> new file mode 100755
> >> index 00000000..8fbdcda0
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tests/generic/568
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> >> +#! /bin/bash
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> >> +#
> >> +# FS QA Test No. generic/568
> >> +#
> >> +# Test that fallocating an unaligned range allocates all blocks
> >> +# touched by that range
> >> +#
> >> +seq=$(basename $0)
> >> +seqres="$RESULT_DIR/$seq"
> >> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> >> +
> >> +here=$PWD
> >> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> >> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> >> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> >> +
> >> +_cleanup()
> >> +{
> >> +	cd /
> >> +	rm -f "$tmp".*
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> >> +. ./common/rc
> >> +. ./common/filter
> >> +
> >> +# real QA test starts here
> >> +_supported_fs generic
> >> +_supported_os Linux
> >> +_require_scratch
> >> +
> >> +testfile="$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile"
> >> +
> >> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> +_scratch_mount
> >> +
> >> +# Fallocate 2 bytes across a block boundary
> >> +block_size=$(stat -fc '%S' "$SCRATCH_MNT")
> > 
> > block_size=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> 
> Ah, nice.
> 
> >> +fallocate -o $((block_size - 1)) -l 2 "$testfile"
> > 
> > If you're going to use an external program, you need to gate the test on
> > whether or not the program's installed, by calling _require_command.
> 
> OK.
> 
> > Though probably the easier way would be to use xfs_io since fstests
> > requires that xfsprogs be installed:
> > 
> > 	$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc $((block_size - 1)) 2" $testfile
> > 
> > Though you do still have to put at the top of the test:
> > 
> > 	_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> > 
> > Because not all filesystems support fallocate.
> 
> So I suppose as long as one doesn’t use special XFS commands, xfs_io is
> filesystem-agnostic?

Right.  At this point xfs_io is largely a testing vehicle for fstests
scripts to call various system calls or ioctls, some of which aren't
even supported on XFS itself. :P

--D

> >> +
> >> +# Both the first blocks should be allocated now.  Check that by
> >> +# inquiring whether the file grows when we write to the two bytes we
> >> +# have just fallocated.
> >> +
> >> +allocated_size_before=$(($(stat -c '%b * %B' "$testfile")))
> >> +
> >> +dd if=/dev/zero of="$testfile" bs=1 conv=notrunc \
> >> +    seek=$((block_size - 1)) count=2 \
> >> +    2>&1 | _filter_dd
> > 
> > $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite $((block_size - 1)) 2" $testfile
> > 
> >> +
> >> +allocated_size_after=$(($(stat -c '%b * %B' "$testfile")))
> >> +
> >> +if [ $allocated_size_after -gt $allocated_size_before ]; then
> >> +	echo "ERROR: File grew from ${allocated_size_before} B to" \
> >> +	     "${allocated_size_after} when writing to the fallocated range."
> >> +else
> >> +	echo "OK: File did not grow."
> > 
> > Other than that, the logic makes sense to me.  Thanks for writing this
> > up!
> 
> OK, thanks, I’ll prepare a v2.
> 
> Max
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2019-09-26 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-26 15:29 [PATCH] generic: fallocate two bytes at block boundary Max Reitz
2019-09-26 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-26 16:02   ` Max Reitz
2019-09-26 16:06     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190926160613.GF9913@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox