public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: test fsync after hole punching when using the no-holes feature
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:13:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191112151340.3688-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Test that when we have the no-holes feature enabled and a specific metadata
layout, if we punch a hole that starts at file offset 0 and fsync the file,
after replaying the log the hole exists.

This currently fails on btrfs but is fixed by a patch for the linux kernel
with the following subject:

 "Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 tests/btrfs/201     | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/btrfs/201.out |   5 +++
 tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/201
 create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/201.out

diff --git a/tests/btrfs/201 b/tests/btrfs/201
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..592ae23d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/btrfs/201
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (C) 2019 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FSQA Test No. 201
+#
+# Test that when we have the no-holes feature enabled and a specific metadata
+# layout, if we punch a hole that starts at file offset 0 and fsync the file,
+# after replaying the log the hole exists.
+#
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1	# failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+	_cleanup_flakey
+	cd /
+	rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/attr
+. ./common/filter
+. ./common/dmflakey
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs btrfs
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch
+_require_dm_target flakey
+_require_attrs
+_require_xfs_io_command "fpunch"
+_require_btrfs_fs_feature "no_holes"
+_require_btrfs_mkfs_feature "no-holes"
+_require_odirect
+
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+# We create the filesystem with a node size of 64Kb because we need to create a
+# specific metadata layout in order to trigger the bug we are testing. At the
+# moment the node size can not be smaller then the system's page size, so given
+# that the largest possible page size is 64Kb and by default the node size is
+# set to the system's page size value, we explicitly create a filesystem with a
+# 64Kb node size, so that the test can run reliably independently of the system's
+# page size.
+_scratch_mkfs -O no-holes -n $((64 * 1024)) >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
+_init_flakey
+_mount_flakey
+
+# Create our first file, which is used just to fill space in a leaf. Its items
+# ocuppy most of the first leaf. We use a large xattr since it's an easy and
+# fast way to fill a lot of leaf space.
+touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
+$SETFATTR_PROG -n 'user.x1' -v $(printf '%0.sX' $(seq 1 63617)) $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
+
+# Create our second file, which we will use to test if fsync persists a hole
+# punch operation against it. Create several extent items for the file, all with
+# a size of 64Kb. The first extent item of this file is located within the first
+# leaf of the fs tree, as its last item, and all the remaining extent items in
+# another leaf.
+offset=0
+for ((i = 0; i <= 10; i++)); do
+	$XFS_IO_PROG -f -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K $offset 64K" \
+		$SCRATCH_MNT/bar >/dev/null
+	offset=$(($offset + 64 * 1024))
+done
+
+# Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted. We also want to start a
+# new transaction and bump the filesystem generation. We don't fsync because we
+# want to keep the 'full sync' flag in the inode of file 'bar', so that the
+# fsync after the hole punch operation uses the slow path, which is necessary to
+# trigger the bug we are testing.
+sync
+
+# Now punch a hole that covers only the first extent item of file bar. That is
+# the only extent item in the first leaf of the first tree, so the hole punch
+# operation will drop it and will not touch the second leaf which contains the
+# remaining extent items. These conditions are necessary to trigger the bug we
+# are testing.
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fpunch 0 64K" -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
+
+echo "File digest before power failure:"
+md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_scratch
+# Simulate a power failure and mount the filesystem to check that replaying the
+# log tree succeeds and our file bar has the expected content.
+_flakey_drop_and_remount
+echo "File digest after power failure and log replay:"
+md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_scratch
+
+_unmount_flakey
+_cleanup_flakey
+
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/201.out b/tests/btrfs/201.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..66631658
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/btrfs/201.out
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+QA output created by 201
+File digest before power failure:
+e1e40ea5ab31cc36fb74830a6293eb2b  SCRATCH_MNT/bar
+File digest after power failure and log replay:
+e1e40ea5ab31cc36fb74830a6293eb2b  SCRATCH_MNT/bar
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
index d56dcafa..d7eeb45d 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/group
+++ b/tests/btrfs/group
@@ -203,3 +203,4 @@
 198 auto quick volume
 199 auto quick trim
 200 auto quick send clone
+201 auto quick punch log
-- 
2.11.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-11-12 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12 15:13 fdmanana [this message]
2019-11-15 16:06 ` [PATCH] btrfs: test fsync after hole punching when using the no-holes feature Filipe Manana
2019-11-19 12:07 ` [PATCH v2] " fdmanana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191112151340.3688-1-fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox