From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E11C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D75020735 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="LNriYV8C" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729997AbgEFSwq (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 14:52:46 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:47045 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729882AbgEFSwp (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 14:52:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588791164; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gAUEejfR9xy6FM3Qn8uEYUCXUl5z+HqCSLvPitvABUc=; b=LNriYV8CqyS/lctOiLVgmRNnZfKFnfHj3zNr0Uw2r3sDiOGpXeEdo2PftZG4/Zlimrcvze s8qnv/YxsZHYX0gDNdioAgZF7vv0tJ1kribP1WL1jQHooHgNZ4NpC1zIj1vP7FbJ0JCaWA T6XarpNAsipNT7CkS8oeKziKPqTxf3o= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-312-LuwvVi7QNVaG4--5JTipEg-1; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:52:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LuwvVi7QNVaG4--5JTipEg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BBF7107B79B for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-113-201.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.113.201]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E85B3610AB; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 13:52:35 -0500 From: Bill O'Donnell To: Eric Sandeen Cc: fstests Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fstests: test restricted symlinks & hardlinks sysctls Message-ID: <20200506185235.GA153719@redhat.com> References: <99a3164b-ee00-113c-e0aa-41eab9633364@redhat.com> <294c5739-ff30-285c-8cf7-11a6dff98294@redhat.com> <20200506184437.GB152947@redhat.com> <58bb57c3-2a35-3d29-b994-3072307b006b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58bb57c3-2a35-3d29-b994-3072307b006b@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:48:19PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/6/20 1:44 PM, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:20:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > ... > > >> +OWNER=fsgqa > >> +OTHER=fsgqa2 > > > > Why fsgqa2 instead of 123456-fsgqa? > > Thanks- > > Bill > > Yeah, not quite sure what to do about that. That username is somewhat specific > to test generic/381 because it wants to test usernames starting with digits. > I hate to proliferate required users, though, so not sure what the best way > to go might be. > > I could maybe/probably use root as one of the users, but didn't want to > over-complicate it with matching admin privs vs. normal user privs. Fair enough. THanks! Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell > > -Eric >