public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] generic/563: use a loop device to avoid partition incompatibility
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:13:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201215001349.GB14354@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214171854.2260900-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:18:54PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> cgroup writeback accounting does not track partition level
> statistics. Instead, I/O is accounted against the parent device. As
> a result, the test fails if the scratch device happens to be a
> device partition. Since parent level stats are potentially polluted
> by factors external to the test, wrap the scratch device in a
> loopback device to guarantee the test always runs on a top-level
> block device.
> 
> Reported-by: Boyang Xue <bxue@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> - Use _require_scratch_nocheck() since the scratch device is not used
>   directly.

V2 looks good to me, thanks Brian.

Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>

> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20201210161426.1927144-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> 
>  tests/generic/563 | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/563 b/tests/generic/563
> index 51deaa2f..b113eacf 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/563
> +++ b/tests/generic/563
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  # Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
>  #
> -# FS QA Test No. 011
> +# FS QA Test No. 563
>  #
>  # This test verifies that cgroup aware writeback properly accounts I/Os in
>  # various scenarios. We perform reads/writes from different combinations of
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ _cleanup()
>  
>  	echo $$ > $cgdir/cgroup.procs
>  	rmdir $cgdir/$seq-cg* > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	umount $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	_destroy_loop_device $LOOP_DEV > /dev/null 2>&1
>  }
>  
>  # get standard environment, filters and checks
> @@ -40,16 +42,14 @@ rm -f $seqres.full
>  
>  # Modify as appropriate.
>  _supported_fs generic
> -_require_scratch
> +_require_scratch_nocheck
>  _require_cgroup2 io
> +_require_loop
>  
>  # cgroup v2 writeback is only support on block devices so far
>  _require_block_device $SCRATCH_DEV
>  
> -smajor=$((0x`stat -L -c %t $SCRATCH_DEV`))
> -sminor=$((0x`stat -L -c %T $SCRATCH_DEV`))
>  cgdir=$CGROUP2_PATH
> -
>  iosize=$((1024 * 1024 * 8))
>  
>  # Check cgroup read/write charges against expected values. Allow for some
> @@ -89,12 +89,19 @@ reset()
>  	rmdir $cgdir/$seq-cg* > /dev/null 2>&1
>  	$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite 0 $iosize" $SCRATCH_MNT/file \
>  		>> $seqres.full 2>&1
> -	_scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "mount failed"
> +	umount $SCRATCH_MNT || _fail "umount failed"
> +	_mount $LOOP_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT || _fail "mount failed"
>  	stat $SCRATCH_MNT/file > /dev/null
>  }
>  
> -_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> -_scratch_mount
> +# cgroup I/O accounting doesn't work on partitions. Use a loop device to rule
> +# that out.
> +LOOP_DEV=$(_create_loop_device $SCRATCH_DEV)
> +smajor=$((0x`stat -L -c %t $LOOP_DEV`))
> +sminor=$((0x`stat -L -c %T $LOOP_DEV`))
> +
> +_mkfs_dev $LOOP_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_mount $LOOP_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT || _fail "mount failed"
>  
>  echo "+io" > $cgdir/cgroup.subtree_control || _fail "subtree control"
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-15  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-14 17:18 [PATCH v2] generic/563: use a loop device to avoid partition incompatibility Brian Foster
2020-12-15  0:13 ` Zorro Lang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201215001349.GB14354@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=zlang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox