From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Chenlong (H)" <chenlongcl.chen@huawei.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, guaneryu@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4/048: Add new regression test
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 09:34:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520163425.GG9648@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a77fe95-2a4d-9092-9fdf-0a4a4fadd418@huawei.com>
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:41:52AM +0800, Chenlong (H) wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/5/20 7:24:35, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:10:15AM +0800, chenlong wrote:
> > > Check the block group zero and prevent initializing reserved inodes.
> > > But in some special cases, the reserved inode may not all belong to
> > > the group zero, it may exist into the second group if we format
> > > filesystem below.
> > > mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -g 8192 -N 1024 -I 4096 /dev/sda
> > > So, it will end up triggering a false positive report of a corrupted
> > > file system
> > >
> > > It's a regression test for commit a149d2a5cabb.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Long <chenlongcl.chen@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/ext4/048 | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/ext4/048.out | 5 +++++
> > > tests/ext4/group | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/ext4/048
> > > create mode 100644 tests/ext4/048.out
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/ext4/048 b/tests/ext4/048
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000..56801579
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/ext4/048
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Huawei. All Rights Reserved.
> > > +#
> > > +# FS QA Test 048
> > > +#
> > > +# Regression test for commit:
> > > +# a149d2a5cabb(ext4: fix check to prevent false positive report of incorrect
> > > +# used inodes)
> > > +#
> > > +seq=`basename $0`
> > > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > > +
> > > +here=`pwd`
> > > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > > +status=1 # failure is the default!
> > > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > > +
> > > +_cleanup()
> > > +{
> > > + cd /
> > > + rm -f $tmp.*
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > > +. ./common/rc
> > > +. ./common/filter
> > > +
> > > +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> > > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > > +
> > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > +_supported_fs ext4
> > > +_require_scratch
> > > +
> > > +echo "+ create scratch fs"
> > > +_scratch_mkfs_ext4 -b 4096 -g 8192 -N 1024 -I 4096 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +
> > > +echo "+ mount fs"
> > > +_scratch_mount -o errors=remount-ro
> > > +sleep 5
> >
> > Why do we need to sleep here? Won't _scratch_mount return nonzero if
> > the (buggy) kernel thought the fs was corrupt?
> >
> > Also, won't the grep below catch that the fs didn't mount?
> >
>
> The default maximum wake-up delay of the lazy init thread of ext4 is
> EXT4_DEF_LI_MAX_START_DELAY (5s).
>
> After mounting the file system, the lazy init thread will be awakened to
> perform group initialization at 0~5s
>
> after the current time. If an error is detected during the initialization
> process, it will be set to read-only,
>
> so the test case needs to delay a little while waiting for the init thread
> to execute.
Oh, that's why there's a delay. Could you paste this explanation into
the test case as a comment right before the 'sleep 5', please?
Also, if the delay is configurable you might want to set it to a known
value at the start of this test.
--D
> in this testcase, _scratch_mount will be return zero, after a short period
> of time, the file system will be remounted as read-only.
>
> In an environment with this bug, such as:
>
> [root@testvm ~]# mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -g 8192 -N 1024 -I 4096 /dev/sda
>
> [root@testvm ~]# mount -o errors=remount-ro /dev/sda /mnt
>
> [root@testvm ~]# mount | grep /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda on /mnt type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)
>
> After the file system is mounted,file system status is rw,but a moment
> later, status will be change to ro.
>
> [root@testvm ~]# mount | grep /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda on /mnt type ext4 (ro,relatime,errors=remount-ro)
>
> > > +
> > > +echo "+ check mountpoint status"
> > > +cat /proc/self/mounts | grep ${SCRATCH_MNT} | \
> >
> > Careful here, if someone sets SCRATCH_MNT=/u, this will match another
> > mount for /usr. At the bare minimum you want 'grep -w' here, I think.
> >
> > --D
> >
>
> There is a risk here and needs to be fixed.
>
> > > + $AWK_PROG '{print $4}' | grep -oE '^rw,' | tee -a $seqres.full
> > > +
> > > +# success, all done
> > > +status=0
> > > +exit
> > > diff --git a/tests/ext4/048.out b/tests/ext4/048.out
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..16e50e86
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/ext4/048.out
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > > +QA output created by 048
> > > ++ create scratch fs
> > > ++ mount fs
> > > ++ check mountpoint status
> > > +rw,
> > > diff --git a/tests/ext4/group b/tests/ext4/group
> > > index ceda2ba6..82b77efb 100644
> > > --- a/tests/ext4/group
> > > +++ b/tests/ext4/group
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> > > 045 auto dir
> > > 046 auto prealloc quick
> > > 047 auto quick dax
> > > +048 auto quick
> > > 271 auto rw quick
> > > 301 aio auto ioctl rw stress defrag
> > > 302 aio auto ioctl rw stress defrag
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0.huawei.25
> > >
> > .
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 3:10 [PATCH] ext4/048: Add new regression test chenlong
2021-05-19 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-20 3:41 ` Chenlong (H)
2021-05-20 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-05-21 11:57 ` Chenlong (H)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210520163425.GG9648@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chenlongcl.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox