[PATCH v3 0/1] generic/{453,454}: Do NOT run for FSs restricting names

[Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>]

Hello,

this is a quick attempt to finish what was discussed in thread:
	generic/453: Exclude filenames that are not supported by exfat
	https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg16328.html

Based on Darrick's comments:

"""
TBH I think these tests (g/453 and g/454) are probably only useful for
filesystems that allow unrestricted byte streams for names.
"""

and_require_names_are_bytes()

"""
Nowadays with wider testing of other filesystems (thanks, Red Hat!) we
should hide these behind _require_names_are_bytes or move them to
tests/xfs/.
"""

Changes in V2:
* Added description for _require_names_are_bytes()
* Added _require_names_are_bytes() to g/454 as well
* fixed typo s/now/not/

Changes in V3:
* Added f2fs to the list of FSs that treat file names as unrestricted byte streams

Pavel Reichl (1):
  generic/{453,454}: Don't run for FSs restricting names

 common/rc         | 13 +++++++++++++
 tests/generic/453 |  1 +
 tests/generic/454 |  1 +
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

-- 
2.31.1