From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, ddouwsma@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/xfs: check avail blocks after log recovery on ro mount
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:55:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210806185545.GE3601425@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806014938.npfn2ykyirfrdlra@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:49:38AM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> And followed by a rw mount.
>
> Suggested-by: Donald Douwsma <ddouwsma@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/xfs/175 | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/175.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/175
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/175.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/175 b/tests/xfs/175
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..2a79a3d4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/175
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2021 RedHat All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 175
> +#
> +# Testcase for kernel commit:
> +# 50d25484bebe xfs: sync lazy sb accounting on quiesce of read-only mounts
> +#
> +# After shutdown and readonly mount, a following read-write mount would
> +# get wrong number of available blocks.
That's a description of the reproduction strategy, but the fault was
that unmounting the log on a readonly filesystem doesn't log the sb
counters. I think it's worth mentioning that in the description.
Thanks for putting together a test case though. :)
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest shutdown auto quick
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> +mount $SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
_scratch_mount ?
Also, you probably want
_xfs_force_bdev data $SCRATCH_MNT
to force testfile to be created on the data device if the test runner
passed -d rtinherit=1 in MKFS_OPTS.
> +
> +# Write test file
> +ls > $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
> +df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
$DF_PROG
> +
> +# Shutdown
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "shutdown -f" $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +# Mount ReadOnly
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mount -oro
> +df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +# Umount and mount rw
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Get fdblocks before repair
> +fdb1=$(df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT | tail -1)
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> +# Repair
> +_repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> +# Re-mount
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Get fdblocks after repair
> +fdb2=$(df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT | tail -1)
> +
> +echo fdb1 $fdb1 fdb2 $fdb2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> +[ $fdb1 -ne $fdb2 ] && echo Wrong fdblocks: $fdb1 and $fdb2
Looks reasonable enough to me.
--D
> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/175.out b/tests/xfs/175.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3b4af34b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/175.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 175
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-06 1:49 [PATCH] tests/xfs: check avail blocks after log recovery on ro mount Murphy Zhou
2021-08-06 18:55 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-08-23 7:05 ` [PATCH v2] tests/xfs: check available " Murphy Zhou
2021-08-23 17:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24 5:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Murphy Zhou
2021-08-24 5:42 ` Eryu Guan
2021-08-24 6:23 ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24 9:06 ` [PATCH v4] tests/generic: check log recovery with readonly mount Murphy Zhou
2021-08-24 12:57 ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24 23:22 ` [PATCH v3] tests/xfs: check available blocks after log recovery on ro mount Donald Douwsma
2021-08-25 1:06 ` Donald Douwsma
2021-08-25 3:26 ` [PATCH v5] tests/generic: check log recovery with readonly mount Murphy Zhou
2021-08-26 0:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-26 7:01 ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24 15:14 ` [PATCH v3] tests/xfs: check available blocks after log recovery on ro mount Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24 16:53 ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-25 23:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-26 0:00 ` Murphy Zhou
2021-08-26 0:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-26 6:59 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210806185545.GE3601425@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=ddouwsma@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xzhou@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox