FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Luís Henriques" <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@suse.com>,
	Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/528: take fs timestamps granularity into account in tolerance interval
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:15:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211108171525.GI24282@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211108144905.11515-1-lhenriques@suse.de>

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:49:05PM +0000, Luís Henriques wrote:
> Filesystems timestamps granularity can cause spurious test failures:
> 
>   QA output created by 528
>   btime has value of 1635818936
>   btime is NOT in range 1635818937 .. 1635818942
> 
> This test output makes it looks like $testfile was created *before* the
> 'date' command was executed.  What really happen was that btime was
> truncated according to the granularity defined by filesystem (I've seen
> this with both ext4 and xfs, but I guess others are also affected).
> 
> Since granularity can't be worse than a second, simply adjust the test
> tolerance interval by 1 second.

/me wonders if that's still going to trip over vfat/ntfs, but as far as
modern xfs/ext4/btrfs go, this should be sufficient.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D


> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> ---
>  tests/generic/528 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/528 b/tests/generic/528
> index 24d1ee0e5ec7..a63827b1139b 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/528
> +++ b/tests/generic/528
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ btime=$(date +%s -d "$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "statx -v -m $STATX_BTIME" $testfile | \
>  	grep 'stat.btime =' | cut -d '=' -f 2)")
>  test -n "$btime" || echo "error: did not see btime in output??"
>  
> -_within_tolerance "btime" "$btime" "$now" 0 5 -v
> +_within_tolerance "btime" "$btime" "$now" 1 5 -v
>  
>  status=0
>  exit

      reply	other threads:[~2021-11-08 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-08 14:49 [PATCH] generic/528: take fs timestamps granularity into account in tolerance interval Luís Henriques
2021-11-08 17:15 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211108171525.GI24282@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=ailiop@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox