public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13 V2] fstests: fixes and more fixes...
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 07:39:18 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220517213918.GP2306852@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517082409.anf5f5wg3yoldpki@zlang-mailbox>

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:24:09PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 05:49:10PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 05:00:59PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > This is a rollup of the two patch series I sent yesterday titled:
> > > 
> > > [PATCH 0/3] fstests: test updates for XFS 5.19 kernel mods
> > > [PATCH 0/3] fstests: more fixes...
> > > 
> > > I've fixed some patches, added documentation for those changes,
> > > and added a bunch of patches to remove deprecated/broken tests that
> > > should ahve been removed long ago.
> > > 
> > > I do not know if patches 9-11 will make it through vger this time -
> > > they didn't as a single patch. They are titled:
> 
> No, they didn't.
> 
> > > 
> > > [PATCH 09/12] xfs/018: remove deprecated test
> > > [PATCH 10/12] xfs/081: remove deprecated test
> > > [PATCH 11/12] xfs/082: remove deprecated test
> > > 
> > > and is thould be pretty obvious what they do from the title....
> > 
> > Ok, it appears as though even separated vger still won't let a
> > single one of them through
> > 
> > Zorro, all these patches are 'git rm' commands
> > 
> > git rm tests/xfs/018*
> > git commit
> > git rm tests/xfs/081*
> > git commit
> > git rm tests/xfs/082*
> > git commit
> > 
> > I'm happy for you to just run them yourself, or do you want me to
> > send a pull request for them?
> 
> Sure, I don't run this 3 cases either. As they're xfs specific cases, so if both
> of you and Darrick agree to remove them entirely, I'm glad to help that :)
> 
> And how about remove them in single one commit/patch? Likes:
> ---
> [PATCH] fstests: remove xfs deprecated test
> 
> Remove xfs/018, xfs/081 and xfs/082 entirely, as they're deprecated
> and obsolete for long time.
> ---

Fine by me. That's exactly what the first patch I attempted to send
was.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-17  7:00 [PATCH 00/13 V2] fstests: fixes and more fixes Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 01/12] fstests: filter quota warnings Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs/122: add attribute log formats to test output Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs/348: golden output is not correct Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 04/12] fstests: fix group list generation for whacky test names Dave Chinner
2022-05-19 18:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-20  8:36   ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-20  8:54     ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-20  9:25       ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-20 16:23         ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-21  0:27           ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 05/12] README: document _begin_fstests better Dave Chinner
2022-05-19 23:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-20  1:58     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-20  2:02       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-20  5:23         ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-20  5:42           ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-20  6:16             ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs/148: make test debuggable Dave Chinner
2022-05-19 18:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs/148: fix failure from bad shortform size assumptions Dave Chinner
2022-05-20  7:34   ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-21 23:22     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 08/12] generic/081: don't run on DAX capable devices Dave Chinner
2022-05-18  5:11   ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  7:01 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs/191: remove broken test Dave Chinner
2022-05-19 18:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-17  7:49 ` [PATCH 00/13 V2] fstests: fixes and more fixes Dave Chinner
2022-05-17  8:24   ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-17 21:39     ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220517213918.GP2306852@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox