From: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/297: fix the delta time based on stat
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:12:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220610131203.887B.409509F4@e16-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610050302.GX1098723@dread.disaster.area>
Hi,
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:36:24PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:35:53AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > > > stat -c '%Y' report seconds as int, so the delta 2.01s may result as 3s.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tests/generic/297 | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/297 b/tests/generic/297
> > > > index 6bdc3e1c..e3082202 100755
> > > > --- a/tests/generic/297
> > > > +++ b/tests/generic/297
> > > > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ for i in $(seq 0 $fnr); do
> > > > touch $TEST_DIR/after
> > > > before=$(stat -c '%Y' $TEST_DIR/before)
> > > > after=$(stat -c '%Y' $TEST_DIR/after)
> > > > - delta=$((after - before))
> > > > + delta=$((after - before -1)) # 2.01s may result as 3s; so -1
> > >
> > > What issue is this change trying to fix? "timeout=8"s is not long enough?
> >
> > for the command
> > $TIMEOUT_PROG -s INT ${kill_after}s
> >
> > delta=$((after - before )) may report 'kill_after+1' in some case.
>
> Yes, that's what it is supposed to report. The process is
> killed 2s after the test starts, so delta is going to be kill_after
> + the delay for the task to exit and the 'touch $TEST_DIR/after'
> command to run. This can take a second or two, depending on how fast
> the reflink operation is proceeding (e.g. waiting on IO).
>
> > so no relationship to "timeout=8" or "timeout=2".
>
> If the reflink doesn't get killed within 6s then delta will be
> greater than the timeout (8) and the test fails. So if delta is 2 or
> 3, then it makes no difference to the test result, right?
>
> > '$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c reflink' without '$TIMEOUT_PROG -s INT ${kill_after}s'
> > may take 20s because this is a very complex reflink.
>
> Yes, and if it takes 20s (i.e. delta=20s) then it means that the
> kill signal was not delivered and acted upon correctly and so the
> test should fail.
If we want to detect the 'timeout', a simple way it to check
the return value of '$TIMEOUT_PROG '
#timeout exit with status 124.
now we just fix this delta value error because of float/int.
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2022/06/10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-10 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 2:35 [PATCH] generic/297: fix the delta time based on stat Wang Yugui
2022-06-10 4:24 ` Zorro Lang
2022-06-10 4:36 ` Wang Yugui
2022-06-10 5:03 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-10 5:12 ` Wang Yugui [this message]
2022-06-10 5:19 ` Zorro Lang
2022-06-10 6:00 ` Wang Yugui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220610131203.887B.409509F4@e16-tech.com \
--to=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox