FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] generic: test i_blocks for truncated large files
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:35:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220920073514.285136-3-preichl@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220920073514.285136-1-preichl@redhat.com>

This is a regression test for an incorrect computation of i_blocks for
truncated files larger than 4 GiB. Bug was filed for exFAT.

Test is based on reproducer provied by Christophe Vu-Brugier as part
of kernel patch-fix submission.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
---
 tests/generic/698     | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/generic/698.out |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tests/generic/698
 create mode 100644 tests/generic/698.out

diff --git a/tests/generic/698 b/tests/generic/698
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..bb21957f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/698
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2022  Red Hat Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test 698
+#
+# Verify that i_blocks for truncated files larger than 4 GiB have correct
+# values.
+#
+# This test verifies the problem fixed in kernel with commit
+# 92fba084b79e exfat: fix i_blocks for files truncated over 4 GiB
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+. ./common/filter
+
+_begin_fstest auto
+
+# Override the default cleanup function.
+_cleanup()
+{
+	cd /
+	rm -r -f $tmp.* $junk_dir
+}
+
+_supported_fs generic
+_fixed_by_kernel_commit 92fba084b79e \
+	"exfat: fix i_blocks for files truncated over 4 GiB"
+
+_require_test
+_require_fs_space $TEST_DIR $((5 * 1024 * 1024)) #kB
+
+junk_dir=$TEST_DIR/$seq
+junk_file=$junk_dir/junk
+mkdir -p $junk_dir
+
+_create_sizedfile 5G $junk_file
+truncate -s 4G $junk_file
+
+block_size=`stat -c '%B' $junk_file`
+iblocks_after_truncate=`stat -c '%b' $junk_file`
+iblocks_expected=$((4 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $block_size))
+
+_within_tolerance "Number of allocated blocks after truncate" $iblocks_after_truncate $iblocks_expected 1% -v
+
+status=0
+
+exit
diff --git a/tests/generic/698.out b/tests/generic/698.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cbb02d37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/698.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 698
+Number of allocated blocks after truncate is in range
-- 
2.37.3


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-20  7:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] generic: test i_blocks for truncated largefiles Pavel Reichl
2022-09-20  7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] common: new helper to alloacate fixed size files Pavel Reichl
2022-09-20 15:03   ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-21  2:48   ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-21  2:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-21  6:01       ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-20  7:35 ` Pavel Reichl [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220920073514.285136-3-preichl@redhat.com \
    --to=preichl@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox