From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] common: Fix file leak in _get_max_file_size
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:04:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220923050452.uuvsydbqlcbiphuo@zlang-mailbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yy0oizGOSvd6Z2Yu@sol.localdomain>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 08:31:23PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:48:19PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > This is obviously mostly problematic for FS lacking support for sparse
> > files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > common/rc | 1 +
> > tests/generic/692 | 0
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/generic/692
> >
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index 228fcb37..c9078649 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -4637,6 +4637,7 @@ _get_max_file_size()
> > l=$m
> > fi
> > done
> > + rm -f $testfile
> > echo $l
> > }
>
> Removing the file is fine, but I didn't have filesystems that lack support for
> sparse files in mind when I wrote this function. Maybe it should look at $FSTYP
> first, and only use the generic algorithm as a fallback for unhandled types?
That might be good idea. The current algorithm takes too long time for fs which
doesn't support sparse file.
Anyway, this $testfile should be removed. If Pavel would like to change this
function likes:
_get_max_file_size()
{
case $FSTYP:
exfat)
# calculate the max file size of exfat according to blocksize, then
echo $max_file_size_of_exfat
;;
# Add ext* if extN forks think it's better
*)
# By default, do the algorithm this function does originally
;;
esac
}
he can split this part as a separated patch, then let's review it. Or we can
have this patch at first, then let Eric change it when he'd like to do that.
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> - Eric
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-23 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 13:48 [PATCH 1/4] common: Fix file leak in _get_max_file_size Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] g/299: speed up the test Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 15:16 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] generic: cleanup test files Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 14:36 ` Zorro Lang
[not found] ` <91ec6d59-5014-2e3e-8e80-aac162b8ffc1@redhat.com>
2022-09-22 15:08 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 17:05 ` Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 17:58 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] g/394: clean up " Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 15:04 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] common: Fix file leak in _get_max_file_size Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 14:51 ` Pavel Reichl
2022-09-23 3:31 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-23 5:04 ` Zorro Lang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220923050452.uuvsydbqlcbiphuo@zlang-mailbox \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=preichl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox