From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: generic/352 should accomodate other pwrite behaviors
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:46:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230823164641.GA11251@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823154350.18829-1-bodonnel@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> xfs_io pwrite issues a series of block size writes, but there is no guarantee
> that the resulting extent(s) will be singular or contiguous. This behavior is
> acceptable, but the test is flawed in that it expects a single extent for a
> pwrite.
>
> Modify test to accept any layout for the reflinked logical range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/generic/352 | 16 +++++++++++-----
> tests/generic/352.out | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/352 b/tests/generic/352
> index 52ec4850..c4ee8a44 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/352
> +++ b/tests/generic/352
> @@ -48,19 +48,25 @@ _pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $blocksize $file | _filter_xfs_io
> # use reflink to create the rest of the file, whose all extents are all
> # pointing to the first extent
> for i in $(seq 1 $nr); do
> - _reflink_range $file 0 $file $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize > /dev/null
> + _reflink_range $file 0 $file $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize > $tmp1.out
$tmp1 isnt defined anywhere.
> done
>
> # then call fiemap on that file to test both the shared flag and if
> # reserved extent mapping search will cause soft lockup
> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file | _filter_fiemap_flags > $tmp.out
> -cat $tmp.out >> $seqres.full
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file | _filter_fiemap_flags > $tmp2.out
> +cat $tmp2.out >> $seqres.full
Nor is $tmp2
>
> # refact the $LOAD_FACTOR to 1 to match the golden output
> sed -i -e "s/$(($last_extent - 1))/$(($orig_last_extent - 1))/" \
> -e "s/$last_extent/$orig_last_extent/" \
> - -e "s/$end/$orig_end/" $tmp.out
> -cat $tmp.out
> + -e "s/$end/$orig_end/" $tmp2.out
> +
> +cat $tmp1.out > tmp.1
> +cat $tmp2.out > tmp.2
Not sure why you didn't make the _reflink_range and the fiemap above
output to $tmp.out1 and $tmp.out2, respectively. If you had, then the
default _cleanup would delete $tmp.* automatically...
> +
> +diff tmp.[12]
> +rm tmp.1
> +rm tmp.2
...and the rm here wouldn't be necessary.
Ok. Nitpicking over. Moving on to the weirder design questions of the
original test:
[add original test author to cc]
I don't know why $blocksize is set to 128k above. If this test needs to
guarantee that there would only be *one* extent (and the golden output
implies this as you note), then it should have been written to say:
blocksize=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
But I don't know if the "btrfs soft lock up and return wrong shared
flag" behavior required sharing a (probably multi-block) 128k range, or
if that was simply what the author selected because it reproduced the
problem.
>
> # success, all done
> status=0
> diff --git a/tests/generic/352.out b/tests/generic/352.out
> index 4ff66c21..ad90ae0d 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/352.out
> +++ b/tests/generic/352.out
> @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
> QA output created by 352
> wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -0: [0..2097151]: shared
> -1: [2097152..2097407]: shared|last
Also I suspect from the test description that the goal here was to
detect the golden output failing because the shared flag does not get
reported correctly.
--D
> --
> 2.41.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 15:43 [PATCH] fstests: generic/352 should accomodate other pwrite behaviors Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2023-08-23 19:55 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 20:42 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 21:01 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 22:18 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 22:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-24 0:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-08-24 3:38 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-24 6:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-08-24 12:11 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-24 18:16 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230823164641.GA11251@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bodonnel@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox