Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfs/503: split copy and metadump into two tests

Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-26T16:45:31Z

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 05:36:17AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/1876
>
> What's it with these weird high test numbers?

Two reasons: I don't have to renumber all my new tests (and update the
spreadsheet I use to track upstreaming status) every time I rebase with
upstream; and the maintainer can git-am the patch as-is, without needing
to hand-edit the patches.

(Hmmm maybe fstests needs a git hook to detect a new test and
automatically renumber it.)

--D

>
> Otherwise looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>