public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: zlang@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/392: stop checking st_blocks
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:52:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240226165206.GP6188@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240226100319.280355-1-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:03:19AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> st_blocks is a rather vaguely defined field.  To quote the Linux stat(2)
> man page:
> 
>     Use of the st_blocks and st_blksize fields may be less portable.
>     (They were introduced in BSD.  The interpretation differs between
>     systems, and possibly on a single system when NFS mounts are
>     involved.)
> 
> or the FreeBSD one:
> 
>     st_blocks   Actual number of blocks allocated for the file in
> 		512-byte units.  As short symbolic links are stored in
> 		the inode, this number may be zero.
> 
> and at least for XFS they include speculative preallocations and
> in-flight COW fork allocations, and the numbers can change when the way
> how data is stored is reorganized.  Because of that it doesn't make sense
> to require st_blocks to not change after a crash even when fsync or
> fdatasync was involved.
> 
> Remove the st_blocks checks and the now superfluous XFS always_cow
> workaround.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

I've long found the st_blocks checking suspect, so

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  tests/generic/392 | 16 +++-------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/392 b/tests/generic/392
> index c4bb3f4b9..0c9efb6df 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/392
> +++ b/tests/generic/392
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>  #
>  # Test inode's metadata after fsync or fdatasync calls.
>  # In the case of fsync, filesystem should recover all the inode metadata, while
> -# recovering i_blocks and i_size at least for fdatasync.
> +# recovering for fdatasync it should at least recovery i_size.
>  #
>  . ./common/preamble
>  _begin_fstest shutdown auto quick metadata punch
> @@ -28,16 +28,6 @@ _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
>  _require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
>  _scratch_mount
>  
> -# This test requires that i_blocks remains unchanged from the start of the
> -# check_inode_metadata call until after recovery is complete.  fpunch calls
> -# turn into pagecache writes if the arguments are not aligned to the fs
> -# blocksize.  If the range being punched is already mapped to a written extent
> -# and alwayscow is enabled, i_blocks will increase by the size of the COW
> -# staging extent.  This causes stat to report different numbers for %b, which
> -# results in a test failure.  Hence do not run this test if XFS is in alwayscow
> -# mode.
> -test "$FSTYP" = "xfs" && _require_no_xfs_always_cow
> -
>  testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
>  
>  # check inode metadata after shutdown
> @@ -47,9 +37,9 @@ check_inode_metadata()
>  
>  	# fsync or fdatasync
>  	if [ $sync_mode = "fsync" ]; then
> -		stat_opt='-c "b: %b s: %s a: %x m: %y c: %z"'
> +		stat_opt='-c "s: %s a: %x m: %y c: %z"'
>  	else
> -		stat_opt='-c "b: %b s: %s"'
> +		stat_opt='-c "s: %s"'
>  	fi
>  
>  	before=`stat "$stat_opt" $testfile`
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-26 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-26 10:03 [PATCH] generic/392: stop checking st_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 16:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-08 15:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-10  9:09     ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240226165206.GP6188@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox