From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EC716FF5F; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709315421; cv=none; b=j0vlMnDaXg3R3bCYEikuPjoIG9J33phDBC5rJX5lgPGJ2/CA85ZTCbZ4jVDBC427zhjSwN+OyswVlXBcn22oXfJ4rW9EVYFbbJzqzW4lK8odt70+1WkqJoMVo4ycT1ytQ4KJgUZ6DJDpnJTwt6ORPnoSMTt/mhEDRSYJVXd9LLI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709315421; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s6NXpyFLPmC6iC/tpoBCBDjApP3V+eLZMqgLl+fJ7As=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iCmJ022pUBvtb29/cA1BEkdLeZ8HlEj5OLUfeSYBjTzDWQPgkyDYe1XgWQ8xgoHJkKVEFltAdOQJIzfGXewW5YJt6ociaO74YqRisz9goxlrX87HiQxCgk6Ij/6I1k5Gi0HkfroNzh52KtqjQfUqikRpkmIhi+pAEww5Jo5l0Oc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=c5Virzo+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c5Virzo+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81908C433C7; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:50:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709315420; bh=s6NXpyFLPmC6iC/tpoBCBDjApP3V+eLZMqgLl+fJ7As=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=c5Virzo+dgLwH/ntac6dKyN/qTQzxoQWvwd1SiAO8XQz7RTP+neJ/S+Phg510WVbt qVM9bImGpbIf8Wje8r26mZtEsc+hz2ov7KuAphhg781jqJEEtn/A9dnR34qS4qIrzR LgXV6Ro8xAsBNmEuqEc4mAIOxAnMVjxTiRSjNB9I3uKEWXGPvrv8U3mvF1jeItXcWq pYh4xZbTJORyqoDlXTX+d5EvVsLglaC17hfUVWaqe0DszfsbW3VZz/DNLHvcz7S2/3 is56H53SXFhr39Qg7kRa5Wxv9XO5fLQ0G9oSq0zQa2iw20TAxC8iGcnKluqtidCJ88 3vjqpVlHwm/4g== Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:50:20 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Zorro Lang Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfs/122: update test to pick up rtword/suminfo ondisk unions Message-ID: <20240301175020.GI1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <170899915207.896550.7285890351450610430.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170899915304.896550.17104868811908659798.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240228012704.GU6188@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240229174831.GB1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240301131848.krj2cdt4u6ss74gz@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240301131848.krj2cdt4u6ss74gz@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:18:48PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:42:07AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:48:31AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > It turns out that xfs/122 also captures ioctl structure sizes, and those > > > are /not/ captured by xfs_ondisk.h. I think we should add those before > > > we kill xfs/122. > > > > Sure, I can look into that. > > Hi Darrick, > > Do you still want to have this patch? > > Half of this patchset got RVB. As it's a random fix patchset, we can choose > merging those reviewed patches at first. Or you'd like to have them together > in next next release? I was about to resend the second to last patch. If you decide to remove xfs/122 then I'll drop this one. --D > Thanks, > Zorro > > > > > > >