From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong " <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: don't run tests that require v4 file systems when not supported
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:40:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240418074046.2326450-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418074046.2326450-1-hch@lst.de>
Add a _require_xfs_nocrc helper that checks that we can mkfs and mount
a crc=0 file systems before running tests that rely on it to avoid failures
on kernels with CONFIG_XFS_SUPPORT_V4 disabled.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
common/xfs | 10 ++++++++++
tests/xfs/002 | 1 +
tests/xfs/095 | 1 +
tests/xfs/096 | 1 +
tests/xfs/132 | 1 +
tests/xfs/148 | 6 ++++++
tests/xfs/194 | 10 ++++++++++
tests/xfs/199 | 1 +
tests/xfs/300 | 1 +
tests/xfs/526 | 3 +++
tests/xfs/612 | 1 +
tests/xfs/613 | 1 +
12 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
index 49ca5a2d5..733c3a5be 100644
--- a/common/xfs
+++ b/common/xfs
@@ -1852,3 +1852,13 @@ _xfs_discard_max_offset_kb()
$XFS_IO_PROG -c 'statfs' "$1" | \
awk '{g[$1] = $3} END {print (g["geom.bsize"] * g["geom.datablocks"] / 1024)}'
}
+
+# check if mkfs and the kernel support nocrc (v4) file systems
+_require_xfs_nocrc()
+{
+ _scratch_mkfs_xfs -m crc=0 > /dev/null 2>&1 || \
+ _notrun "v4 file systems not supported"
+ _try_scratch_mount > /dev/null 2>&1 || \
+ _notrun "v4 file systems not supported"
+ _scratch_unmount
+}
diff --git a/tests/xfs/002 b/tests/xfs/002
index 8dfd2693b..26d0cd6e4 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/002
+++ b/tests/xfs/002
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ _begin_fstest auto quick growfs
_supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch_nocheck
_require_no_large_scratch_dev
+_require_xfs_nocrc
_scratch_mkfs_xfs -m crc=0 -d size=128m >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
diff --git a/tests/xfs/095 b/tests/xfs/095
index a3891c85e..e7dc3e9f4 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/095
+++ b/tests/xfs/095
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ _begin_fstest log v2log auto
_supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch
_require_v2log
+_require_xfs_nocrc
if [ "$(blockdev --getss $SCRATCH_DEV)" != "512" ]; then
_notrun "need 512b sector size"
diff --git a/tests/xfs/096 b/tests/xfs/096
index 7eff6cb1d..0a1bfb3fa 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/096
+++ b/tests/xfs/096
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch
_require_xfs_quota
+_require_xfs_nocrc
function option_string()
{
diff --git a/tests/xfs/132 b/tests/xfs/132
index ee1c8c1ec..b46d3d28c 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/132
+++ b/tests/xfs/132
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
# we intentionally corrupt the filesystem, so don't check it after the test
_require_scratch_nocheck
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# on success, we'll get a shutdown filesystem with a really noisy log message
# due to transaction cancellation. Hence we don't want to check dmesg here.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/148 b/tests/xfs/148
index c9f634cfd..fde3bf476 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/148
+++ b/tests/xfs/148
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ _cleanup()
_supported_fs xfs
_require_test
_require_attrs
+_require_xfs_nocrc
+
_disable_dmesg_check
imgfile=$TEST_DIR/img-$seq
@@ -40,6 +42,10 @@ test_names=("something" "$nullstr" "$slashstr" "another")
rm -f $imgfile $imgfile.old
# Format image file w/o crcs so we can sed the image file
+#
+# TODO: It might be possible to rewrite this using proper xfs_db
+# fs manipulation commands that would work with CRCs.
+#
# We need to use 512 byte inodes to ensure the attr forks remain in short form
# even when security xattrs are present so we are always doing name matches on
# lookup and not name hash compares as leaf/node forms will do.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/194 b/tests/xfs/194
index 5a1dff5d2..2fcc55b3e 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/194
+++ b/tests/xfs/194
@@ -30,6 +30,16 @@ _supported_fs xfs
# real QA test starts here
_require_scratch
+
+#
+# This currently forces nocrc because only that can support 512 byte block size
+# and thus block size = 1/8 page size on 4k page size systems.
+# In theory we could run it on systems with larger page size with CRCs, or hope
+# that large folios would trigger the same issue.
+# But for now that is left as an exercise for the reader.
+#
+_require_xfs_nocrc
+
_scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null 2>&1
# For this test we use block size = 1/8 page size
diff --git a/tests/xfs/199 b/tests/xfs/199
index 4669f2c3e..f99b04db3 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/199
+++ b/tests/xfs/199
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ _cleanup()
_supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# clear any mkfs options so that we can directly specify the options we need to
# be able to test the features bitmask behaviour correctly.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300
index 2ee5eee71..bc1f0efc6 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/300
+++ b/tests/xfs/300
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ _begin_fstest auto fsr
. ./common/filter
_require_scratch
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# real QA test starts here
diff --git a/tests/xfs/526 b/tests/xfs/526
index 4261e8497..c5c5f9b1a 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/526
+++ b/tests/xfs/526
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ _require_test
_require_scratch_nocheck
_require_xfs_mkfs_cfgfile
+# Currently the only conflicting options are v4 specific
+_require_xfs_nocrc
+
cfgfile=$TEST_DIR/a
rm -rf $cfgfile
diff --git a/tests/xfs/612 b/tests/xfs/612
index 4ae4d3977..0f6df7deb 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/612
+++ b/tests/xfs/612
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch_xfs_inobtcount
_require_command "$XFS_ADMIN_PROG" "xfs_admin"
_require_xfs_repair_upgrade inobtcount
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# Make sure we can't upgrade to inobt on a V4 filesystem
_scratch_mkfs -m crc=0,inobtcount=0,finobt=0 >> $seqres.full
diff --git a/tests/xfs/613 b/tests/xfs/613
index 522358cb3..8bff21711 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/613
+++ b/tests/xfs/613
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
_fixed_by_kernel_commit 237d7887ae72 \
"xfs: show the proper user quota options"
+_require_xfs_nocrc
_require_test
_require_loop
_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 7:40 fix kernels without v5 support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs/045: don't force v4 file systems Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs/263: split out the v4 test Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs/512: split out v4 specific tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs/{158,160}: split out v4 tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 15:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-18 15:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: don't run tests that require v4 file systems when not supported Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240418074046.2326450-6-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox