From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B40B2F4A; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729528911; cv=none; b=UEWCTDalhhoMnjOiGhNOvBOcErRjAHmeKvUgLxhfV8iwMQHjYX9EzBWD1VVDge5OIxZvZ6Hgg4Ol5M1NdfJCduCc4NM3NajlBEZEIRMNPv8edKx6slbxbkr1Ky0JWHpkpWWcNCgXQUpPxLNvHG6rTHRBoSSuf6Q9riCbwSZqRK8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729528911; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z6YFOuzYD521pPB31+qZaVvkiJ4NAAD6cnO8yrX7s4w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cbfTpgoHZQk8oOXNw/BvC+DTBPdxwKWERQ2j0SiqtrZMZ61R9YeJsTxRYurrvLHbzMEom1qaTZoUVaSUpAd1UOoj5dWUU+/Ng+pjJA2B3x6iRH4QpzPk7x1CBWPmNk7oi4kI0QsPSbDTsE6hbWTFqx1EAdZulk7tlZRQFmrU0PY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pjWzMJRn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pjWzMJRn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECC38C4CEC3; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:41:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729528911; bh=Z6YFOuzYD521pPB31+qZaVvkiJ4NAAD6cnO8yrX7s4w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pjWzMJRnqbgVTgm+o5RmPo9WygAEFPChQuK2UCPS+k14ss60uFQpKrJclqhZB9nlq i6GJHINqKpxLSnSJvxuAcRpeorWqYZwGqTLfooiXSi7jUPzCYN5Q6qOrBTPSZpxrdT O95d9U3OMwP4U6ATo4zY3B6VOUzlYiJXA6xU9hOXKBVX2dR+m/3iQKDvnCwkmKUDjn n30BjOpHgxMpOvQRU2kpAgPrJB976Wx5oTeBgbIkHKyOnpuaRQWY4Z+6+E/9DFuMws sy5ycNuNY+jP7BxTURjPmyWUip7/n/jJso6/M07YvY2yX3KDk2T8bONBzb+ha5d4Yp LNUCR3ifTqrwg== Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:41:50 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests Message-ID: <20241021164150.GG2578692@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20241017163405.173062-1-bfoster@redhat.com> <20241018050909.GA19831@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 07:29:22AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 07:09:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:34:03PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > > I believe you reproduced a problem with your customized realtime variant > > > of the initial test. I've not been able to reproduce any test failures > > > with patch 2 here, though I have tried to streamline the test a bit to > > > reduce unnecessary bits (patch 1 still reproduces the original > > > problems). I also don't tend to test much with rt, so it's possible my > > > config is off somehow or another. Otherwise I _think_ I've included the > > > necessary changes for rt support in the test itself. > > > > > > Thoughts? I'd like to figure out what might be going on there before > > > this should land.. > > > > Darrick mentioned that was just with his rt group patchset, which > > make sense as we don't have per-group metadata without that. > > > > Ah, that would explain it then. > > > Anyway, the series looks good to me, and I think it supersedes my > > more targeted hand crafted reproducer. > > > > Ok, thanks. It would be nice if anybody who knows more about the rt > group stuff could give the rt test a quick whirl and just confirm it's > at least still effective in that known broken case after my tweaks. > Otherwise I'll wait on any feedback on the code/test itself... thanks. Perplexingly, I tried this out on the test fleet last night and got zero failures except for torvalds TOT. Oh, I don't have any recoveryloop VMs that also have rt enabled, maybe that's why 610 didn't pop anywhere. --D > Brian >