From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4482D1C3F10 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731677664; cv=none; b=g3oJ6LA0fLNCsUcR92QJqKaxrTsCymaeN1pZxHiKfIwKO6WNiAvz06+JkTpKl8zvN8AtgNuBBbDL9bVxcICioUA8Zd25v9zewUCu8FdKsNuJFltVaaYghZ0Up3/YohSAyXsNCpDAkA2Odqw7B1Zfc7jqxTLYeHs0fwVC7bZ6jbo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731677664; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gLbDLLFaCm+pneJ0ecZSsUz4EzSQvHIor0UF/fLR+1I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h6LchlnA6ziCbctb9K2t1aO7bnxAIERNKNP2yvrC+3gPIW645WneZB7jWvhcEnCBiea4fhMx+9VZylmp/+s0/f3p8npEDrbhATycYcsao7CXWpEQl49NNuGdIGdUEZ7oE0follO7AXgMLyAYZhU1aOyXFpHm8ZmK3RfhbSdTgfg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b=HCXdOAuq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b="HCXdOAuq" Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-173-48-119-105.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.119.105]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 4AFDY7rU014540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:34:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1731677650; bh=YXeu00rAkkBMx+jCW+Umq2TqKt3Mm3W0qM6ehUOiUGQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HCXdOAuqIff8JiBA+SBbi/24u8UbEcsuWvhHECXJwMtaea6XMUhQ8BpksgSVVUNQE +t4yP0l/T+Wd/bWC9xsdiSG+q+njib6F70qvRObkSyD712Noh6FDprtJHFOGY2uSN+ ccagrW96Jv0F6FwCkVeIceLRjkC3U3ZYGHvN8vnyHZMw75gXLw+DP9YpcCyNWJUNwG JrEBYBqbyN9mev6VkIti12/P5edZh61O8RQHD293ZsJTmRfcK22b4M5oz3j5NCuMFF o8ba5W1WHo4d8S/rSXmfsdEF1turAm1X/L/lq3PBJwsq71kY9MnacCYFhM3QDd47pt 9X0xI88FotM5A== Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id CB07215C0317; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:34:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:34:07 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Christian Brauner Cc: Linux Filesystem Development List , fstests@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Leah Rumancik , "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: generic/645 failing on ext4, xfs (probably others) on all LTS kernels Message-ID: <20241115133407.GB582565@mit.edu> References: <20241110180533.GA200429@mit.edu> <20241111-tragik-busfahren-483825df1c00@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241111-tragik-busfahren-483825df1c00@brauner> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 09:52:07AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > behavior would be well-specified so the patch changed that quite some > time ago. > > Backporting this to older LTS kernels isn't difficult. We just need > custom patches for the LTS kernels but they should all be very simple. > > Alternatively, you can just ignore the test on older kernels. Well, what the custom patch to look like wasn't obvious to me, but that's because I'm not sufficiently familiar with the id mapping code. So I'll just ignore the test on older kernels. If someone wants to create the custom patch, I'll revert the versioned exclude for {kvm,gce}-xfsteests. Thanks, - Ted