From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E3D158A09; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749566760; cv=none; b=EMVxibgFVXBcPswChBIoKHf4g3cQ2TKWnx0Nq4KjoVV1SwvE7o9SoBreqto6Meo/KD1bLOOQ9F2XC33Q9voVQi6yyuIJrW7iiji3Ivd1pnXHbhok+I3lWy+QS1Yjh6G/9oO1z1MA/YxZU0coU86W1JZKpmRU822xP+thaej6eCQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749566760; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J9nGwxfwXz5iylx/qn3XaM0i2N9hObkU173+pStnLoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ppPEX/nK+c5c/sHAkuy/c21+/3lsJbZfRlKpCuN6Bna6LF6iNVEiyAcyeKI4QPN6/pyhZxiXDb5QIL6NeLzCFOZQ8Zj4IBxGd6oiiSQq8mz9kqXSr/D5oiSz1vd0YW2ZU1q+U1Seq+5Ea/Yp1hu4tp/bjrZFlZIgP4IdV6I50CQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cDLQFtgt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cDLQFtgt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 883A6C4CEEF; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:46:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749566760; bh=J9nGwxfwXz5iylx/qn3XaM0i2N9hObkU173+pStnLoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cDLQFtgtl0JSeASXXjyDwEy7Inh5tlw/03f7nCwxLofeoGhCx5RrWcsePlsouegFv uzEMBfPdEHKRj0/SGcN5pO5Wm23wiBfuAdtfK0ZDU1bfUxRgXWUZeaxZmnkWbtnGJS fG3bUoe/AmGo5wz22xM2JaSeqNVOR7pNGg/5ENhriKbuUhNga1vCrLMgtbJN8n+JAI 4u2ZVuhveAb/d+wzpRnVrn3acS32j3AAAvCGhI/wuEZKYyPM3tiGHOk8Swche2HDJi tVhZfZmWp6KuDHlLmgVOyvknKQwoqspLKBSWAKgHWvXQ1oKZ9pzGUEMGRO6xpBmdo9 eDPnjjUe1R//Q== Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 07:46:00 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Ma Xinjian Cc: zlang@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/603: add _require_scrub Message-ID: <20250610144600.GD6143@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250610091134.152557-1-maxj.fnst@fujitsu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250610091134.152557-1-maxj.fnst@fujitsu.com> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 05:11:34PM +0800, Ma Xinjian wrote: > From: Xinjian Ma > > This test uses xfs_scrub which is an EXPERIMENTAL and unstable feature. > Add _require_scrub to check if the system supports it. > > Signed-off-by: Xinjian Ma Oops, thanks for the correction. Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > --- > tests/xfs/603 | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/603 b/tests/xfs/603 > index 04122b55..d6058a3e 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/603 > +++ b/tests/xfs/603 > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ _require_xfs_db_command iunlink > # until after the directory repair code was merged > _require_xfs_io_command repair -R directory > _require_scratch_nocheck # repair doesn't like single-AG fs > +_require_scrub > > # From the AGI definition > XFS_AGI_UNLINKED_BUCKETS=64 > -- > 2.49.0 > >