From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: zlang@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: add a test that zoned file systems with rump RTG can't be mounted
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:50:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251210165028.GC7725@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210142330.3660787-1-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:23:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Garbage collection assumes all zones contain the full amount of blocks.
> Mkfs already ensures this happens, but the kernel mount code did not
> verify this. Instead such a file system would eventually fail scrub.
>
> Add a test to verify the new superblock verifier check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> tests/xfs/651 | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/651.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/651
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/651.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/651 b/tests/xfs/651
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..3aef7a1d016f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/651
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 Christoph Hellwig.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 651
> +#
> +# Test that the sb verifier rejects zoned file system with rump RTGs.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick zone
> +
> +. ./common/zoned
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +blocks=$(_scratch_xfs_db -c 'sb 0' -c 'print rblocks' | awk '{print $3}')
blocks="$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field rblocks 'sb 0')"
> +blocks=$((blocks - 4096))
> +_scratch_xfs_db -x -c 'sb 0' -c "write -d rblocks $blocks" > /dev/null 2>&1
> +_scratch_xfs_db -x -c 'sb 0' -c "write -d rextents $blocks" > /dev/null 2>&1
> +_try_scratch_mount || _notrun "Can't mount rump RTG file system"
Doesn't the _notrun here cause the test to be "skipped" when in fact it
actually exhibits the behavior that you want (i.e. it passes)?
--D
> +
> +# for non-zoned file systems this can succeed
> +_require_xfs_scratch_zoned
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/651.out b/tests/xfs/651.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..62617d172811
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/651.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 651
> +Can't mount rump RTG file system
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 14:23 [PATCH] xfs: add a test that zoned file systems with rump RTG can't be mounted Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-12-10 16:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251210165028.GC7725@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox