From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] common: add a _check_dev_fs helper
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:24:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251210232410.GK94594@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210054831.3469261-4-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 06:46:49AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a helper to run the file system checker for a given device, and stop
> overloading _check_scratch_fs with the optional device argument that
> creates complication around scratch RT and log devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>
> Note: dmthin should probably do the same as dmflakey does, but all
> my attempts never got the new SCRATCH_DEV value propagated out of
> _dmthin_init. Maybe someone smarted than me wants to give it another
> try.
One of those dm wrappers has that weird behavior that it has to be
`source'able from a shell invoked by a subprocess. That's caused me
headaches in the past.
Nevertheless, these changes look ok so
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> common/dmthin | 6 +++++-
> common/rc | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> tests/btrfs/176 | 4 ++--
> tests/generic/648 | 2 +-
> tests/xfs/601 | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/dmthin b/common/dmthin
> index a1e1fb8763c0..3bea828d0375 100644
> --- a/common/dmthin
> +++ b/common/dmthin
> @@ -33,7 +33,11 @@ _dmthin_cleanup()
> _dmthin_check_fs()
> {
> _unmount $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null 2>&1
> - _check_scratch_fs $DMTHIN_VOL_DEV
> + OLD_SCRATCH_DEV=$SCRATCH_DEV
> + SCRATCH_DEV=$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV
> + _check_scratch_fs
> + SCRATCH_DEV=$OLD_SCRATCH_DEV
> + unset OLD_SCRATCH_DEV
> }
>
> # Set up a dm-thin device on $SCRATCH_DEV
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index c3cdc220a29b..8618f77a00b5 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -3692,14 +3692,14 @@ _check_test_fs()
> esac
> }
>
> -_check_scratch_fs()
> +# check the file system passed in as $1
> +_check_dev_fs()
> {
> - local device=$SCRATCH_DEV
> - [ $# -eq 1 ] && device=$1
> + local device=$1
>
> case $FSTYP in
> xfs)
> - _check_xfs_scratch_fs $device
> + _check_xfs_filesystem $device "none" "none"
> ;;
> udf)
> _check_udf_filesystem $device $udf_fsize
> @@ -3751,6 +3751,19 @@ _check_scratch_fs()
> esac
> }
>
> +# check the scratch file system
> +_check_scratch_fs()
> +{
> + case $FSTYP in
> + xfs)
> + _check_xfs_scratch_fs $SCRATCH_DEV
> + ;;
> + *)
> + _check_dev_fs $SCRATCH_DEV
> + ;;
> + esac
> +}
> +
> _full_fstyp_details()
> {
> [ -z "$FSTYP" ] && FSTYP=xfs
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/176 b/tests/btrfs/176
> index 86796c8814a0..f2619bdd8e44 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/176
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/176
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ swapoff "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" > /dev/null 2>&1
> # Deleting device 1 should work again after swapoff.
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device delete "$scratch_dev1" "$SCRATCH_MNT"
> _scratch_unmount
> -_check_scratch_fs "$scratch_dev2"
> +_check_dev_fs "$scratch_dev2"
>
> echo "Replace device"
> _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ swapoff "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" > /dev/null 2>&1
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG replace start -fB "$scratch_dev1" "$scratch_dev2" "$SCRATCH_MNT" \
> >> $seqres.full
> _scratch_unmount
> -_check_scratch_fs "$scratch_dev2"
> +_check_dev_fs "$scratch_dev2"
>
> # success, all done
> status=0
> diff --git a/tests/generic/648 b/tests/generic/648
> index 7473c9d33746..1bba78f062cf 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/648
> +++ b/tests/generic/648
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ if [ -f "$loopimg" ]; then
> _metadump_dev $DMERROR_DEV $seqres.scratch.final.md
> echo "final scratch mount failed"
> fi
> - SCRATCH_RTDEV= SCRATCH_LOGDEV= _check_scratch_fs $loopimg
> + _check_dev_fs $loopimg
> fi
>
> # success, all done; let the test harness check the scratch fs
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/601 b/tests/xfs/601
> index df382402b958..44911ea389a7 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/601
> +++ b/tests/xfs/601
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ copy_file=$testdir/copy.img
>
> echo copy
> $XFS_COPY_PROG $SCRATCH_DEV $copy_file >> $seqres.full
> -_check_scratch_fs $copy_file
> +_check_dev_fs $copy_file
>
> echo recopy
> $XFS_COPY_PROG $copy_file $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 5:46 stop overriding SCRATCH_{,LOG,RT}DEV Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 01/12] dmflakey: override SCRATCH_DEV in _init_flakey Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 02/12] ext4/006: call e2fsck directly Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 03/12] common: add a _check_dev_fs helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 04/12] ext4/032: use _check_dev_fs Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 05/12] generic/590: split XFS RT specific bits out Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 22:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs/157: don't override SCRATCH_{,LOG,RT}DEV Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 20:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs/185: don't use SCRATCH_{,RT}DEV helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 20:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs/424: don't use SCRATCH_DEV helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs/521: require a real SCRATCH_RTDEV Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11 4:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs/528: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11 4:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs/530: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11 4:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-12 20:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 5:46 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs/650: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 22:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11 4:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251210232410.GK94594@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox