From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E6F27B34D; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765569769; cv=none; b=tWiUc9xocefaBgf5mDQDxTYpTiAmiwO0Z5m6B3EMq7MX7FJYQL2VmATHgZHbN7vVGMGOwUX47dG1Pm5fVEEW27X32BRbHwQ6ZKO2p/vPNKVuzul/s3tqhMANoi3WXCL0g3BeWoVhjX9Zff7nrTUIDzAtBq32ZRzM1qIZu0Oxy7M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765569769; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E2SrUWciw4QRNY8reyJE57n71cfqDtlvoy2sdI9Fw+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MULZS2dZSdV7cct6Sr4q2D35dJTKVmVxdB9EaOQqf+Gh+S9unV5V/KLQWDHIZ/yxRfYWY6Tr6CxY40+W34IbCKppCYh7jx56tQS4RsHK4b4TQFo0NuZIPjJesXYSGPf+PewsEIQTvUfVVKAqU9FuVVALWj7C7WJ0vyvAvFRbNVQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DZG4Nr61; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DZG4Nr61" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 711C4C4CEF1; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:02:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765569767; bh=E2SrUWciw4QRNY8reyJE57n71cfqDtlvoy2sdI9Fw+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DZG4Nr61/WxRQeciEHPGOSHb0CBTt87M9b5wX7LOl22e4cYXZsxSCegLZf17EhuCP Qi553UGqLFByqiKdSpkqz6BrFTwZOkyfevUwptsAjLyJqDn7PDHMvsSI0p6D9Ex+Nu Zu0mwRldY5JAkKcF/J5w1iuRmGngVtpyZkblk9qkwQXVh992it8adYUL7pZW8gVVvp baVqbkPPWpavTrVEGkZ8cnFfd49quZchZzoU8b1eaEEEK0dV6YPALY2wvYAjeufvUK Rz3uTDyixyOU6/mj97QxDNdK6CNttX8Rc3CKn8DTkHBDH12enx/uTAuqjeJYGGfWRc fxawLN50E9JOQ== Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 12:02:46 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Zorro Lang , Anand Jain , Filipe Manana , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] ext4/006: call e2fsck directly Message-ID: <20251212200246.GE7716@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20251212082210.23401-1-hch@lst.de> <20251212082210.23401-3-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251212082210.23401-3-hch@lst.de> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > _check_scratch_fs takes an optional device name, but no optional > arguments. Call e2fsck directly for this extN-specific test instead. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > tests/ext4/006 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/ext4/006 b/tests/ext4/006 > index 2ece22a4bd1e..ab78e79d272d 100755 > --- a/tests/ext4/006 > +++ b/tests/ext4/006 > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ repair_scratch() { > res=$? > if [ "${res}" -eq 0 ]; then > echo "++ allegedly fixed, reverify" >> "${FSCK_LOG}" > - _check_scratch_fs -n >> "${FSCK_LOG}" 2>&1 > + e2fsck -n "${SCRATCH_DEV}" >> "${FSCK_LOG}" 2>&1 Minor nit: $E2FSCK_PROG, not e2fsck. With that fixed, Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > res=$? > fi > echo "++ fsck returns ${res}" >> "${FSCK_LOG}" > -- > 2.47.3 > >