From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: zlang@kernel.org, luca.dimaio1@gmail.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/841: create a block device that must exist
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 09:53:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260303175300.GT57948@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202085701.343099-1-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 09:57:01AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This test currently creates a block device node for /dev/ram0,
> which isn't guaranteed to exist, and can thus cause the test to
> fail with:
>
> mkfs.xfs: cannot open $TEST_DIR/proto/blockdev: No such device or address
>
> Instead, create a node for the backing device for $TEST_DIR, which must
> exist.
Hrm. I'm still noticing regressions with this test, particularly when
the blocksize of the test filesystem is different from the block size
of the $IMG_FILE filesystem.
So I started looking for fsblock discrepancies between
xfs_reproducible_test.img.[1-3] and noticed that EOF block contents are
different if the file being copied in has sparse holes in it that are
not aligned to the fsblock size of the new filesystem.
IOWs, if $TEST_DIR is a 1k fsblock filesystem and the $IMG_FILE
filesystems have 4k fsblocks, you can write 1k at odd offsets (e.g. 1k,
3k, 5k, 7k, etc) and the created file does not match the file in the
proto dir.
I traced this to design thinko in libxfs_file_write -- it assumes that
the caller always wants to write the full block, even if the buffer
passed in does not cover the entire range of the block. Therefore it'll
zero the head and the tail of the xfs_buf before writing it out.
Thus, the region at 1k causes mkfs to allocate fileoff 0 (which is a 4k
block). Then libxfs_file_write writes 1024 bytes of zeroes, 1024 bytes
of copied-in data, and 2048 bytes of more zeroes.
Next, the region at 3k causes mkfs to re-call libxfs_file_write, but
this time it writes 3072 bytes of zeroes and 1024 bytes of copied-in
data, thus obliterating the first write.
That bug's on me, and I'll fix it in writefile by rounding data_pos and
hole_pos outward as needed to be aligned to the block size of the copied
in filesystem. And I'll update xfs/841 to compare $PROTO_DIR against
what's in the new filesystem.
That fixes the data corruption problem, but then the test still fails
because now the space map isn't the same between mkfs invocations.
--D
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> tests/xfs/841 | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/841 b/tests/xfs/841
> index ee2368d4a746..ddb1b3bea104 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/841
> +++ b/tests/xfs/841
> @@ -85,9 +85,12 @@ _create_proto_dir()
> $here/src/af_unix "$PROTO_DIR/socket" 2> /dev/null || true
>
> # Block device (requires root)
> - mknod "$PROTO_DIR/blockdev" b 1 0 2> /dev/null || true
> + # Uses the device for $TEST_DIR to ensure it always exists.
> + mknod "$PROTO_DIR/blockdev" b $(stat -c '%Hd %Ld' $TEST_DIR) \
> + 2> /dev/null || true
>
> # Character device (requires root)
> + # Uses /dev/null, which should always exist
> mknod "$PROTO_DIR/chardev" c 1 3 2> /dev/null || true
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 8:57 [PATCH] xfs/841: create a block device that must exist Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 18:54 ` Luca Di Maio
2026-02-03 8:28 ` Zorro Lang
2026-03-03 17:53 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-04 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260303175300.GT57948@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.dimaio1@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox