From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5123CD8BB; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 22:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782773938; cv=none; b=aU6h92X1xRH1+2iBq9xWfb3ZfkxekskZY8U15Dm6ft6ZRdeNYeIWGnyqkT4idW8yAiDhjdKAC3RIMQow93EDsIQRn4Xb2pgyZ6Li6vvcnlS+eS6CNjVtWOh/Z8/dcf0SxlzEYgNomPM0uMUtOVrXBBJKC3WMDfxIvhrM0k6jlsc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782773938; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ogegkbp90XszGNzdoxRRkavDrho2Qyu04OgkUeRgRFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Lg5u2mKj6LobSuqWjnH7JCj5U6rdU4NaOYVDIEstrPsuuMXUfHBQqTGHXD9KfxqYkPlHXtpMtvH9vZMF535VxBlFW+REXh/qPCBBimcKEyNp4OVG665RMzUoew6+QavcDjTlkcIE1pm91BSL8SOVIEKF9frau/qU47x+u1Y0dxQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Pj2/3jnj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Pj2/3jnj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id AE6261F000E9; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 22:58:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782773937; bh=RjFZ7ggerNF4Kl3istM3FVs5O1TSX656rtv4KYO756s=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Pj2/3jnjys+M/pEBVdP3ljp7PU5POxBZ2sl0Uo11KH1Oz0Y2VqVsbqWFdaZYXqvQ9 OwLe53Ub3OIdV9Oxuu8qonm3y/56AOB1ic+wLouSmd37yfksJxCvidMd0B3L5Pdxfk PMzG+t1BScGKTy43KsKa5KFgyeGSMqVVOJB5vlXJC9CghnTixRH1tGPT+VkqL4UQ1M ljwDUDSFCm38CA2sU/JZyUxf6hxG8IsiHe0bPuHzr3NJaC2mB3AA0SS6sIkTPNZ2Gn 4F4YvLdXea2aLVg8eavtJERoJ6s3Yfr7hwTEtdlKXyDUDIJOXTTj/MZhM0sjOIcBmf OxlbnLQ2kFtLg== Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 15:58:57 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig , Lukas Herbolt , Eric Sandeen , Shin'ichiro Kawasaki , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs/216: disable all concurrency scaling Message-ID: <20260629225857.GH6095@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20260619050937.444488-1-hch@lst.de> <20260619050937.444488-3-hch@lst.de> <20260626045353.GA8735@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 02:00:10AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 06:53:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I'll retract this patch in favour of the btrfs fix from Darrick. > > We'll still need patch 1, though. > > Let me make sure I have the current status mapped out correctly. So we > should apply/merge the following patches: > > [PATCH 1/2] common/xfs: fix _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supports_concurrency > [PATCH 2/2] xfs/21[67]: fix mkfs log concurrency detection > [PATCH 1/2] xfs/078: disable all concurrency scaling > > And revert: > [PATCH 2/2] xfs/216: disable all concurrency scaling > > Is that correct? Sounds fine to me. --D