From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6199B30F533; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787354865; cv=none; b=H9Uno/E0IubaO6k2CO0wL/k4oTESRhUqH5GZHAViO/7hkhKPNaJvNAxi6UfO27DnZJvhI/kTtdUt/VSaiCyM6VF+syHXbCje7H2hx5Oq9EplQ4hLKlmverBMA2WvE+dMs2cXDqaWYI0cdEQbfpVEjESshMWBC9MSIIRtN53hmYg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787354865; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JHgnv4kMmCTOIZ6jij0MVt8TYeJ3idTL+yZwMhFEnl4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PnoRE/cpiNlxscMfgCrAK0w4avZDYpht3sAQ+TMjPtp0vV/3twt/9Xc1cL4CEun6rcnfmIRpqJYrMDRoUWQjGIe3ZhZW4rNM4ZrZDudUA2vIHcIUWsuFTqpEcQ90fFhLB6qAWLL9qvUTSb+DIDIi0cF0tMz/jfn3+rskCLnhiFM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=d4RuQ2Ni; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="d4RuQ2Ni" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 24D2A1F000E9; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:27:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787354864; bh=fEy5SZpIQpL1zxNj0z/t+6CU//F0Q/5IbpqqjxZru18=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=d4RuQ2Ni4P2R/Ev9xfEfeioOImJR2Sf2GeIceIdWDKGDvNJFDujww5RozD3JngwMV sy7S542Rhzih9DwTx5MGfi5qzISWbXN5JFEyu2byaoEh0JLByRY9CQMJUBja136CGB FT/RKHIh5mIJihlC4DWKWV0MBjQF2vcQxRclMT2yVmihvi1E3BXKOKlW09Oq9KM69w muunD6R1/zgUtO4bBo8LBrZZiG8UZZ80VaGKIMHiBt6N/sKzq0FOSyhYrDczc0C4an QI2Gpa4/aU4QUkQqztdxGXFiA6el3P2EyATl/dcNUJeT4aoQa3FWCI14BSGZIFTCcu /Yeo70X9KGxSw== Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:27:43 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Bart Van Assche Cc: John Garry , Christoph Hellwig , Zorro Lang , fstests@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K. Petersen" , Kanchan Joshi , Anuj Gupta , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] common/scsi_debug: don't slow down I/O Message-ID: <20260821232743.GD839663@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20260821051133.1817670-1-hch@lst.de> <20260821051133.1817670-2-hch@lst.de> <23760489-a45c-4b00-8500-9e8f4c9189df@acm.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23760489-a45c-4b00-8500-9e8f4c9189df@acm.org> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 09:14:29AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 8/21/26 12:41 AM, John Garry wrote: > > On 21/08/2026 06:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > scsi_debug by defaults delays I/O > > > > Maybe we can just make delay=0 default for that driver. Or use ndelay > 0. > > I'm in favor of changing the default delay to zero. It's what most users > need and it's easy to forget to specify delay=0 when loading scsi_debug. I didn't even *know* that you had to do that! I agree with these changes. Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > Thanks, > > Bart. >